MHYB
Mackenzie Global High Yield Fixed Income ETF

Full MHYB fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, MHYB features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, MHYB has returned 0.49% year-to-date with +$20 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 13.22% with +$387 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MHYB
+0.55%+0.86%+0.49%+3.62%+19.61%
ZSP
+4.86%+16.98%+13.22%+31.67%+88.82%
Flows
MHYB
+$19 M+$19 M+$20 M+$10 M+$29 M
ZSP
-$19 M+$214 M+$387 M+$1,273 M+$4,986 M

MHYB vs ZSP exposure

Countries

MHYB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%

Sectors

MHYB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MHYB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%

Diversification

MHYB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%

Characteristics

Compare
MHYB
ZSP
ProviderMackenzie InvestmentsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield4.68%0.74%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 26, 2017November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about MHYB and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MHYB or ZSP?
As of June 18, 2026, MHYB has returned 0.49% year to date, while ZSP has returned 13.22%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MHYB or ZSP?
As of June 18, 2026, MHYB manages $287.13 M in assets, while ZSP manages $24.23 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MHYB and ZSP managed?
MHYB is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MHYB or ZSP?
Year to date, MHYB has seen +$20.37 M in net flows, compared with +$386.70 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MHYB and ZSP compare?
MHYB has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about MHYB and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds