VS
When evaluating costs, MIDB features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.08% for ZAG. Performance-wise, MIDB has returned 0.46% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas ZAG is at 0.87% with +$106 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MIDB
ZAG
| AuM | $10.08 M | $12,302.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MIDB | +1.29% | +0.02% | +0.46% | +0.20% | - |
ZAG | +1.50% | +0.07% | +0.87% | +2.90% | +11.01% | |
| Flows | MIDB | -$3 M | -$5 M | -$4 M | +$10 M | - |
ZAG | +$30 M | +$65 M | +$106 M | +$1,629 M | +$6,009 M |
MIDB vs ZAG exposure
Countries
MIDB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
MIDB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Municipal
29.15%
Sovereign
25.83%
Other
14.55%
Government agencies
9.37%
Other
21.10%
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MIDB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada, Bonds 3% 1jun2034, CAD
4.29%
Canada, Bond 2.25 1jun2029 10Y
3.59%
Province of Quebec, 2.75% 1sep2028, CAD (B124)
2.92%
Canada Housing Trust, 1.1% 15mar2031, CAD (95)
2.65%
Canada, Bond 2.75 1dec2048 30Y
2.46%
Province of Quebec, 3.5% 1dec2048, CAD (B117)
2.41%
Canada, Bonds 4% 1mar2029, CAD
2.27%
Canada Housing Trust, 3.55% 15sep2032, CAD (107)
2.22%
Bank of Montreal, 3.19% 1mar2028, CAD
2.20%
Province of Ontario, 2.9% 2jun2028, CAD (DMTN238)
2.20%
Diversification
MIDB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 86 total
27.20%
Characteristics
Compare
MIDB
ZAG
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.01% | 3.46% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 26, 2025 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about MIDB and ZAG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MIDB or ZAG?
As of April 24, 2026, MIDB has returned 0.46% year to date, while ZAG has returned 0.87%. ZAG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MIDB or ZAG?
As of April 24, 2026, MIDB manages $10.08 M in assets, while ZAG manages $12.30 B. ZAG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MIDB and ZAG managed?
MIDB is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZAG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MIDB or ZAG?
Year to date, MIDB has seen -$4.13 M in net flows, compared with +$105.84 M for ZAG. ZAG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MIDB and ZAG compare?
MIDB has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while ZAG has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about MIDB and ZAG
BMO ETF Spotlight - More than Just a Bank
BMO is more than just a bank, learn more about BMO’s extensive ETF offerings.
Posted on 3/22/2023 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.