MPAY
Global X Mid-Term U.S. Treasury Premium Yield ETF

Full MPAY fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Global X Mid-Term U.S. Treasury Premium Yield ETF (MPAY) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that MPAY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Sovereign and Non-Corporate, while HEWB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, MPAY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, MPAY has returned 0.83% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 32.58% with +$23 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jun 22Jun 25Jun 29Jul 2Jul 6Jul 8Jul 10Jul 14Jul 16Jul 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MPAY
-0.64%-0.69%+0.83%+3.55%-
HEWB
+1.97%+16.45%+32.58%+67.04%+147.84%
Flows
MPAY
-$1 M+$8 M+$4 M-$0 M-
HEWB
+$4 M+$16 M+$23 M+$22 M+$25 M

MPAY vs HEWB exposure

Countries

MPAY
Other
90.89%
USA
9.11%
HEWB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

MPAY
Other
90.89%
Sovereign
9.11%
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MPAY
CA37966J3001
29.79%
CA37893H1047
25.39%
US912797UT22
6.42%
US912797TP29
6.26%
US912797TN70
5.29%
US912797TX52
3.83%
US912797RF64
3.58%
US912797TQ02
3.29%
US912797UH83
1.63%
US912797RS85
1.54%
HEWB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%

Diversification

MPAY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 57 total
87.01%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
MPAY
HEWB
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield8.80%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 4, 2023January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about MPAY and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MPAY or HEWB?
As of July 20, 2026, MPAY has returned 0.83% year to date, while HEWB has returned 32.58%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MPAY or HEWB?
As of July 20, 2026, MPAY manages $73.67 M in assets, while HEWB manages $345.76 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MPAY and HEWB managed?
MPAY is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do MPAY and HEWB emphasize?
MPAY is most exposed to Sovereign and Non-Corporate. HEWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MPAY or HEWB?
Year to date, MPAY has seen +$4.20 M in net flows, compared with +$23.13 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MPAY and HEWB compare?
MPAY has an expense ratio of 0.56%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of MPAY and HEWB?
MPAY's largest holdings include USA, Bonds 4.125% 15aug2053, USD and USA, Bonds 4.75% 15nov2053, USD. HEWB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: MPAY or HEWB?
MPAY holds 42 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, MPAY is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about MPAY and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds