VS
Compare Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF (MSFH) vs Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF (MSFH.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. MSFH and MSFH.U provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology. When evaluating costs, MSFH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.4% for MSFH.U. Performance-wise, MSFH has returned 16.05% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas MSFH.U is at 17.6% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MSFH
MSFH.U
| AuM | $45.04 M | $5.75 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSFH | -0.88% | +0.08% | -16.05% | -13.43% | - |
MSFH.U | -2.91% | -2.46% | -17.60% | -15.76% | - | |
| Flows | MSFH | +$5 M | +$15 M | +$32 M | +$38 M | - |
MSFH.U | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$3 M | +$5 M | - |
MSFH vs MSFH.U exposure
Countries
MSFH
USA
100.80%
MSFH.U
USA
100.80%
Sectors
MSFH
Information Technology
100.80%
MSFH.U
Information Technology
100.80%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MSFH
MICROSOFT-T
100.80%
MSFH.U
MICROSOFT-T
100.80%
Diversification
MSFH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.80%
MSFH.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.80%
Characteristics
Compare
MSFH
MSFH.U
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 19.12% | 19.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 21, 2024 | August 21, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about MSFH and MSFH.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MSFH or MSFH.U?
As of June 12, 2026, MSFH has returned -16.05% year to date, while MSFH.U has returned -17.60%. MSFH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MSFH or MSFH.U?
As of June 12, 2026, MSFH manages $45.04 M in assets, while MSFH.U manages $5.75 M. MSFH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MSFH and MSFH.U managed?
MSFH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. MSFH.U is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do MSFH and MSFH.U emphasize?
MSFH is most exposed to Information Technology. MSFH.U is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MSFH or MSFH.U?
Year to date, MSFH has seen +$32.07 M in net flows, compared with +$3.01 M for MSFH.U. MSFH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MSFH and MSFH.U compare?
MSFH has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while MSFH.U has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of MSFH and MSFH.U?
MSFH's largest holdings include MICROSOFT-T. MSFH.U's top holdings include MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MSFH or MSFH.U?
MSFH holds 1 securities, while MSFH.U holds 1. On holdings count, MSFH is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.