VS
Compare Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF (MSFH) vs Harvest NVIDIA High Income Shares ETF (NVDH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. MSFH and NVDH provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology. When evaluating costs, MSFH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.4% for NVDH. Performance-wise, MSFH has returned 16.05% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas NVDH is at 12.71% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MSFH
NVDH
| AuM | $45.04 M | $36.07 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MSFH | -0.88% | +0.08% | -16.05% | -13.43% | - |
NVDH | -3.55% | +12.71% | +12.71% | +44.32% | - | |
| Flows | MSFH | +$5 M | +$15 M | +$32 M | +$38 M | - |
NVDH | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$10 M | - |
MSFH vs NVDH exposure
Countries
MSFH
USA
100.80%
NVDH
USA
101.00%
Sectors
MSFH
Information Technology
100.80%
NVDH
Information Technology
101.00%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MSFH
MICROSOFT-T
100.80%
NVDH
NVIDIA
101.00%
Diversification
MSFH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.80%
NVDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
101.00%
Characteristics
Compare
MSFH
NVDH
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 19.12% | 17.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 21, 2024 | August 21, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about MSFH and NVDH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MSFH or NVDH?
As of June 12, 2026, MSFH has returned -16.05% year to date, while NVDH has returned 12.71%. NVDH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MSFH or NVDH?
As of June 12, 2026, MSFH manages $45.04 M in assets, while NVDH manages $36.07 M. MSFH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MSFH and NVDH managed?
MSFH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. NVDH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do MSFH and NVDH emphasize?
MSFH is most exposed to Information Technology. NVDH is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MSFH or NVDH?
Year to date, MSFH has seen +$32.07 M in net flows, compared with +$5.66 M for NVDH. MSFH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MSFH and NVDH compare?
MSFH has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while NVDH has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of MSFH and NVDH?
MSFH's largest holdings include MICROSOFT-T. NVDH's top holdings include NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: MSFH or NVDH?
MSFH holds 1 securities, while NVDH holds 1. On holdings count, MSFH is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.