MSFH
Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF

Full MSFH fund page
VS
QQQT
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund

Full QQQT fund page

Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF (MSFH) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund (QQQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that MSFH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while QQQT leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Finance. When evaluating costs, MSFH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.25% for QQQT. Performance-wise, MSFH has returned 3.23% year-to-date with +$38 M in net flows, whereas QQQT is at 24.66% with +$21 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Aug 14Aug 21Aug 28Sep 4Sep 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 14, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MSFH
+2.57%+20.19%+3.23%-1.25%-
QQQT
-2.63%-3.78%+24.66%+31.64%+142.95%
Flows
MSFH
-$0 M+$6 M+$38 M+$42 M-
QQQT
+$1 M+$7 M+$21 M+$41 M+$95 M

MSFH vs QQQT exposure

Countries

MSFH
USA
104.75%
QQQT
USA
95.14%

Sectors

MSFH
Technology
104.75%
QQQT
Technology
96.17%
As of September 14, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MSFH
Microsoft Corp.
104.75%
QQQT
Microsoft Corp.
11.46%
Apple, Inc.
10.92%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.27%
Broadcom Inc.
9.26%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.29%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.33%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.99%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.51%
Intel Corp.
2.47%

Diversification

MSFH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
104.75%
QQQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
71.61%

Characteristics

Compare
MSFH
QQQT
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield16.25%0.24%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 21, 2024July 11, 2023

Frequently asked questions about MSFH and QQQT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MSFH or QQQT?
As of September 14, 2026, MSFH has returned 3.23% year to date, while QQQT has returned 24.66%. QQQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MSFH or QQQT?
As of September 14, 2026, MSFH manages $60.75 M in assets, while QQQT manages $152.44 M. QQQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MSFH and QQQT managed?
MSFH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. QQQT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do MSFH and QQQT emphasize?
MSFH is most exposed to Technology. QQQT is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MSFH or QQQT?
Year to date, MSFH has seen +$38.11 M in net flows, compared with +$21.29 M for QQQT. MSFH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MSFH and QQQT compare?
MSFH has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while QQQT has an expense ratio of 0.46%.
What are the top holdings of MSFH and QQQT?
MSFH's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp.. QQQT's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MSFH or QQQT?
MSFH holds 1 securities, while QQQT holds 46. On holdings count, QQQT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about MSFH and QQQT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds