MSTY
Harvest Strategy Inc. High Income Shares ETF

Full MSTY fund page
VS
ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWC fund page

Harvest Strategy Inc. High Income Shares ETF (MSTY) and BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that MSTY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while ZWC leans towards Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, MSTY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.65% for ZWC. Performance-wise, MSTY has returned 16.28% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas ZWC is at 15.75% with +$314 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-5051015202530%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MSTY
+20.09%-8.12%-16.28%-58.90%-
ZWC
+0.82%+3.87%+15.75%+26.45%+66.78%
Flows
MSTY
+$1 M+$7 M+$18 M+$56 M-
ZWC
+$25 M+$117 M+$314 M+$364 M+$286 M

MSTY vs ZWC exposure

Countries

MSTY
USA
101.63%
ZWC
Canada
98.15%

Sectors

MSTY
Technology
101.63%
ZWC
Finance
40.64%
Energy
22.76%
Non-Energy Materials
11.23%
Other
25.37%
As of September 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MSTY
Strategy, Inc.
101.63%
ZWC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.06%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.27%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
5.85%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
5.74%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
5.62%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.71%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
4.66%
TC Energy Corp.
4.03%
Bank of Montreal
3.82%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.17%

Diversification

MSTY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
101.63%
ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
51.92%

Characteristics

Compare
MSTY
ZWC
ProviderHarvest Portfolios GroupBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield72.77%5.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 16, 2025February 9, 2017

Frequently asked questions about MSTY and ZWC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MSTY or ZWC?
As of September 2, 2026, MSTY has returned -16.28% year to date, while ZWC has returned 15.75%. ZWC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MSTY or ZWC?
As of September 2, 2026, MSTY manages $52.49 M in assets, while ZWC manages $2.48 B. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MSTY and ZWC managed?
MSTY is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do MSTY and ZWC emphasize?
MSTY is most exposed to Technology. ZWC is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MSTY or ZWC?
Year to date, MSTY has seen +$17.78 M in net flows, compared with +$313.89 M for ZWC. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MSTY and ZWC compare?
MSTY has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of MSTY and ZWC?
MSTY's largest holdings include Strategy, Inc.. ZWC's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
Which ETF is more diversified: MSTY or ZWC?
MSTY holds 1 securities, while ZWC holds 39. On holdings count, ZWC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about MSTY and ZWC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds