VS
When evaluating costs, MTRX features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.2% for CIAI. Performance-wise, MTRX has returned 28.27% year-to-date with +$47 M in net flows, whereas CIAI is at 25.8% with -$41 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MTRX
CIAI
| AuM | $62.18 M | $1,206.74 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.64% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.46% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MTRX | -2.26% | -9.51% | +28.27% | +39.53% | - |
CIAI | +0.78% | -4.08% | +25.80% | +25.28% | - | |
| Flows | MTRX | +$2 M | +$8 M | +$47 M | +$52 M | - |
CIAI | -$8 M | +$44 M | -$41 M | +$64 M | - |
MTRX vs CIAI exposure
Countries
MTRX
USA
41.21%
Canada
13.73%
Ireland
10.66%
Other
34.40%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
MTRX
Industrials
38.64%
Non-Energy Materials
23.81%
Technology
22.10%
Energy
9.47%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MTRX
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.88%
Schneider Electric SE
5.50%
Amphenol Corp.
5.39%
Antofagasta Plc
5.26%
Southern Copper Corp.
5.24%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.05%
ABB Ltd.
5.04%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.94%
Eaton Corp. Plc
4.74%
Teck Resources Limited
4.67%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
MTRX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
51.71%
CIAI
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
MTRX
CIAI
| Provider | Global X | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 20, 2025 | May 2, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about MTRX and CIAI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MTRX or CIAI?
As of September 18, 2026, MTRX has returned 28.27% year to date, while CIAI has returned 25.80%. MTRX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MTRX or CIAI?
As of September 18, 2026, MTRX manages $62.18 M in assets, while CIAI manages $1.21 B. CIAI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MTRX and CIAI managed?
MTRX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure Index - CAD benchmark. CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MTRX or CIAI?
Year to date, MTRX has seen +$46.85 M in net flows, compared with -$40.78 M for CIAI. MTRX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MTRX and CIAI compare?
MTRX has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%.
Recent articles about MTRX and CIAI
Chip Stocks Enter a Bear Market: What It Means for Canadian AI ETFs
Canadian-listed semiconductor and AI ETFs fell as much as 11% this week as chip stocks entered a global bear market, even as investors kept adding money into the weakness.
Posted on 7/20/2026 by Edouard Caillieux inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.