VS
Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF (MULC) and Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that MULC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while CAUS leans towards Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, MULC features a management fee (MER) of 0.37%, compared to 0.19% for CAUS. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MULC
CAUS
| AuM | $16.52 M | $446.69 M |
| Management Fees | 0.37% | 0.19% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.42% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MULC | -0.71% | +2.29% | +13.46% | +18.77% | +62.65% |
CAUS | -1.86% | +2.48% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | MULC | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$6 M | +$6 M | -$1 M |
CAUS | +$64 M | +$206 M | - | - | - |
MULC vs CAUS exposure
Countries
MULC
USA
95.72%
CAUS
USA
95.29%
Sectors
MULC
Technology
33.52%
Finance
16.84%
Industrials
10.47%
Healthcare
9.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.07%
Other
20.73%
CAUS
Technology
33.17%
Finance
16.96%
Industrials
9.96%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.63%
Healthcare
7.98%
Other
22.30%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MULC
Apple, Inc.
4.27%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.05%
Microsoft Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.64%
Broadcom Inc.
1.81%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.22%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.16%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.04%
CAUS
NVIDIA Corp.
5.17%
Apple, Inc.
5.00%
Microsoft Corp.
3.74%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.71%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.09%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.71%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.64%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.36%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.31%
Diversification
MULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 767 total
24.00%
CAUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,059 total
27.53%
Characteristics
Compare
MULC
CAUS
| Provider | Manulife Investments | CIBC |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.79% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 23, 2017 | February 20, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about MULC and CAUS
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MULC or CAUS?
As of September 3, 2026, MULC manages $16.52 M in assets, while CAUS manages $446.69 M. CAUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MULC and CAUS managed?
MULC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USD benchmark. CAUS is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do MULC and CAUS emphasize?
MULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CAUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
How do the fees of MULC and CAUS compare?
MULC has an expense ratio of 0.42%, while CAUS has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of MULC and CAUS?
MULC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CAUS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MULC or CAUS?
MULC holds 753 securities, while CAUS holds 2026. On holdings count, CAUS is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.