MULC
Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF

Full MULC fund page
VS
CVLU.B
CI U.S. Enhanced Value Index ETF

Full CVLU.B fund page

Compare Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF (MULC) vs CI U.S. Enhanced Value Index ETF (CVLU.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. MULC provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while CVLU.B is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, MULC features a management fee (MER) of 0.37%, compared to 0.3% for CVLU.B. Performance-wise, MULC has returned 13.46% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas CVLU.B is at 21.64% with -$44 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 3, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MULC
-0.71%+2.29%+13.46%+18.77%+62.65%
CVLU.B
+0.91%+8.12%+21.64%+31.20%-
Flows
MULC
+$0 M+$0 M+$6 M+$6 M-$1 M
CVLU.B
-$3 M-$10 M-$44 M-$87 M-

MULC vs CVLU.B exposure

Countries

MULC
USA
95.72%
CVLU.B
USA
95.42%

Sectors

MULC
Technology
33.52%
Finance
16.84%
Industrials
10.47%
Healthcare
9.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.07%
Other
20.73%
CVLU.B
Technology
34.95%
Finance
16.14%
Healthcare
14.82%
Industrials
9.00%
Other
25.09%
As of September 3, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MULC
Apple, Inc.
4.27%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.05%
Microsoft Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.64%
Broadcom Inc.
1.81%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.22%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.16%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.04%
CVLU.B
Microsoft Corp.
7.67%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.64%
Apple, Inc.
4.82%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.58%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.45%
Johnson & Johnson
1.44%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.33%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.25%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.14%

Diversification

MULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 767 total
24.00%
CVLU.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 810 total
30.01%

Characteristics

Compare
MULC
CVLU.B
ProviderManulife InvestmentsCI
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkJohn Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USDVettaFi US Enhanced Value Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.79%1.27%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 23, 2017January 16, 2024

Frequently asked questions about MULC and CVLU.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MULC or CVLU.B?
As of September 3, 2026, MULC has returned 13.46% year to date, while CVLU.B has returned 21.64%. CVLU.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MULC or CVLU.B?
As of September 3, 2026, MULC manages $16.52 M in assets, while CVLU.B manages $48.79 M. CVLU.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MULC and CVLU.B managed?
MULC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USD benchmark. CVLU.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the VettaFi US Enhanced Value Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do MULC and CVLU.B emphasize?
MULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CVLU.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MULC or CVLU.B?
Year to date, MULC has seen +$5.83 M in net flows, compared with -$44.14 M for CVLU.B. MULC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MULC and CVLU.B compare?
MULC has an expense ratio of 0.42%, while CVLU.B has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
What are the top holdings of MULC and CVLU.B?
MULC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CVLU.B's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., NVIDIA Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MULC or CVLU.B?
MULC holds 753 securities, while CVLU.B holds 806. On holdings count, CVLU.B is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds