VS
Compare Manulife Multifactor U.S. Large Cap Index ETF (MULC) vs Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. MULC and DRFU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, MULC features a management fee (MER) of 0.37%, compared to 0.5% for DRFU. Performance-wise, MULC has returned 13.46% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas DRFU is at 15.18% with +$189 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MULC
DRFU
| AuM | $16.52 M | $426.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.37% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.42% | 0.46% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MULC | -0.71% | +2.29% | +13.46% | +18.77% | +62.65% |
DRFU | -2.09% | +1.41% | +15.18% | +21.76% | +79.08% | |
| Flows | MULC | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$6 M | +$6 M | -$1 M |
DRFU | +$190 M | +$190 M | +$189 M | +$184 M | +$180 M |
MULC vs DRFU exposure
Countries
MULC
USA
96.42%
DRFU
USA
96.25%
Sectors
MULC
Technology
33.52%
Finance
16.84%
Industrials
10.70%
Healthcare
9.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.07%
Other
20.50%
DRFU
Technology
39.58%
Finance
16.41%
Industrials
9.92%
Healthcare
9.67%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.34%
Other
16.08%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MULC
Apple, Inc.
4.27%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.05%
Microsoft Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.64%
Broadcom Inc.
1.81%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.22%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.16%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.04%
DRFU
Apple, Inc.
6.47%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.07%
Microsoft Corp.
3.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.70%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.63%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.81%
Broadcom Inc.
1.78%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.69%
Lam Research Corp.
1.57%
Diversification
MULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 767 total
24.00%
DRFU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
30.38%
Characteristics
Compare
MULC
DRFU
| Provider | Manulife Investments | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.79% | 0.86% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | March 23, 2017 | September 27, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about MULC and DRFU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MULC or DRFU?
As of September 3, 2026, MULC has returned 13.46% year to date, while DRFU has returned 15.18%. DRFU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MULC or DRFU?
As of September 3, 2026, MULC manages $16.52 M in assets, while DRFU manages $426.54 M. DRFU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MULC and DRFU managed?
MULC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Total Return Index - USD benchmark. DRFU is actively managed by Desjardins Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do MULC and DRFU emphasize?
MULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. DRFU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MULC or DRFU?
Year to date, MULC has seen +$5.83 M in net flows, compared with +$188.98 M for DRFU. DRFU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MULC and DRFU compare?
MULC has an expense ratio of 0.42%, while DRFU has an expense ratio of 0.46%.
What are the top holdings of MULC and DRFU?
MULC's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. DRFU's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MULC or DRFU?
MULC holds 759 securities, while DRFU holds 99. On holdings count, MULC is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.