MWMN
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF

Full MWMN fund page
VS
CGQD.B
CI Global Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF

Full CGQD.B fund page

Compare Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF (MWMN) vs CI Global Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (CGQD.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. MWMN provides Information Technology, Financials, and Health Care exposures, while CGQD.B is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Industrials, and Health Care. When evaluating costs, MWMN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.45% for CGQD.B. Performance-wise, MWMN has returned 4.88% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas CGQD.B is at 5.94% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MWMN
+3.74%+4.20%+4.88%+20.29%+45.82%
CGQD.B
+3.32%+2.41%+5.94%+16.69%-
Flows
MWMN
+$0 M+$1 M+$1 M-$5 M-$22 M
CGQD.B
+$0 M+$4 M+$6 M+$15 M-

MWMN vs CGQD.B exposure

Countries

MWMN
USA
64.54%
Other
7.19%
Other
28.27%
CGQD.B
USA
71.87%
Other
28.13%

Sectors

MWMN
Information Technology
35.61%
Financials
15.92%
Health Care
8.36%
Other
7.53%
Industrials
7.24%
Other
25.35%
CGQD.B
Information Technology
24.43%
Industrials
12.68%
Health Care
11.86%
Consumer Discretionary
11.16%
Communication Services
10.90%
Financials
9.13%
Other
19.84%
As of May 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MWMN
NVIDIA
9.51%
MICROSOFT-T
9.17%
APPLE
8.36%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO
2.76%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.30%
TERNA RETE ELETTRICA NAZIONALE
2.07%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.55%
HYDRO ONE
1.54%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.52%
S&P GLOBAL INC
1.41%
CGQD.B
NVIDIA
5.39%
APPLE
3.93%
MICROSOFT-T
3.41%
EXXON
2.52%
META PLATFORMS
2.34%
COCA-COLA
2.12%
HOME DEPOT
2.03%
ORACLE SYS
1.82%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.76%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.75%

Diversification

MWMN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 145 total
40.20%
CGQD.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 548 total
27.08%

Characteristics

Compare
MWMN
CGQD.B
ProviderMackenzie InvestmentsCI
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.29%0.55%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateDecember 4, 2017September 6, 2024

Frequently asked questions about MWMN and CGQD.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MWMN or CGQD.B?
As of May 12, 2026, MWMN has returned 4.88% year to date, while CGQD.B has returned 5.94%. CGQD.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MWMN or CGQD.B?
As of May 12, 2026, MWMN manages $8.14 M in assets, while CGQD.B manages $44.09 M. CGQD.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MWMN and CGQD.B managed?
MWMN is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. CGQD.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do MWMN and CGQD.B emphasize?
MWMN is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Health Care. CGQD.B is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MWMN or CGQD.B?
Year to date, MWMN has seen +$0.54 M in net flows, compared with +$5.93 M for CGQD.B. CGQD.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MWMN and CGQD.B compare?
MWMN has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while CGQD.B has an expense ratio of 0.48%.
What are the top holdings of MWMN and CGQD.B?
MWMN's largest holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T, and APPLE. CGQD.B's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: MWMN or CGQD.B?
MWMN holds 143 securities, while CGQD.B holds 513. On holdings count, CGQD.B is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about MWMN and CGQD.B

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds