VS
Mackenzie Global Women's Leadership ETF (MWMN) and RBC Global Large-Cap Equity Fund (RGLE) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that MWMN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Health Care, while RGLE leans towards Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, MWMN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.75% for RGLE. Performance-wise, MWMN has returned 4.18% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas RGLE is at 5.72% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
MWMN
RGLE
| AuM | $8.08 M | $1.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.62% | 1.02% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MWMN | +4.76% | +2.43% | +4.18% | +24.06% | +45.60% |
RGLE | +6.87% | +4.06% | +5.72% | +23.34% | - | |
| Flows | MWMN | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$5 M | -$22 M |
RGLE | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | - |
MWMN vs RGLE exposure
Countries
MWMN
USA
64.54%
Other
7.19%
Other
28.27%
RGLE
USA
60.17%
Other
14.72%
Other
25.11%
Sectors
MWMN
Information Technology
35.61%
Financials
15.92%
Health Care
8.36%
Other
7.53%
Industrials
7.24%
Other
25.35%
RGLE
Information Technology
25.08%
Other
17.50%
Financials
12.60%
Industrials
11.24%
Consumer Discretionary
8.51%
Health Care
8.39%
Other
16.68%
As of May 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
MWMN
NVIDIA
9.51%
MICROSOFT-T
9.17%
APPLE
8.36%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO
2.76%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.30%
TERNA RETE ELETTRICA NAZIONALE
2.07%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
1.55%
HYDRO ONE
1.54%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.52%
S&P GLOBAL INC
1.41%
RGLE
NVIDIA
5.77%
APPLE
4.51%
MICROSOFT-T
3.60%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.00%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.89%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.39%
EXXON
1.36%
LILLY
1.07%
ASML HOLDING
0.98%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
0.83%
Diversification
MWMN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 145 total
40.20%
RGLE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 193 total
24.40%
Characteristics
Compare
MWMN
RGLE
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.30% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | December 4, 2017 | April 9, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about MWMN and RGLE
Which ETF has performed better year to date: MWMN or RGLE?
As of May 6, 2026, MWMN has returned 4.18% year to date, while RGLE has returned 5.72%. RGLE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MWMN or RGLE?
As of May 6, 2026, MWMN manages $8.08 M in assets, while RGLE manages $1.36 M. MWMN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MWMN and RGLE managed?
MWMN is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. RGLE is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do MWMN and RGLE emphasize?
MWMN is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Health Care. RGLE is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MWMN or RGLE?
Year to date, MWMN has seen +$0.54 M in net flows, compared with +$0.00 M for RGLE. MWMN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MWMN and RGLE compare?
MWMN has an expense ratio of 0.62%, while RGLE has an expense ratio of 1.02%.
What are the top holdings of MWMN and RGLE?
MWMN's largest holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T, and APPLE. RGLE's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MWMN or RGLE?
MWMN holds 143 securities, while RGLE holds 187. On holdings count, RGLE is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about MWMN and RGLE
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.