NACO
Ninepoint Alternative Credit Opportunities Fund

Full NACO fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

When evaluating costs, NACO features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, NACO has returned 1.96% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.65% with +$209 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
NACO
+0.12%+0.86%+1.96%+4.17%+21.61%
ZEB
+1.98%+16.51%+32.65%+67.24%+148.29%
Flows
NACO
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M+$1 M-$18 M
ZEB
+$972 M+$1,234 M+$209 M+$894 M-$431 M

NACO vs ZEB exposure

Countries

NACO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

NACO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

NACO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%

Diversification

NACO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
NACO
ZEB
ProviderNinepoint PartnersBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.10%2.29%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 14, 2021October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about NACO and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: NACO or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, NACO has returned 1.96% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.65%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NACO or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, NACO manages $5.75 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.26 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NACO and ZEB managed?
NACO is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NACO or ZEB?
Year to date, NACO has seen +$0.34 M in net flows, compared with +$209.29 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NACO and ZEB compare?
NACO has an expense ratio of 1.62%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.

Recent articles about NACO and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds