NHYB
NBI High Yield Bond ETF

Full NHYB fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, NHYB features a management fee (MER) of 0.69%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, NHYB has returned 0.88% year-to-date with +$82 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.78% with -$62 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22Apr 29May 6

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
NHYB
+0.18%-0.84%-0.88%+0.58%+7.16%
ZUT
-1.94%+10.98%+15.78%+28.82%+38.18%
Flows
NHYB
+$13 M+$55 M+$82 M+$232 M+$244 M
ZUT
+$25 M-$33 M-$62 M+$134 M+$311 M

NHYB vs ZUT exposure

Countries

NHYB
USA
80.00%
Other
20.00%
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

NHYB
Other
100.00%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

NHYB
US698ESCAA82
80.00%
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

NHYB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
80.00%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
NHYB
ZUT
ProviderNational Bank InvestmentsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.90%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 4, 2020January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about NHYB and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: NHYB or ZUT?
As of May 8, 2026, NHYB has returned -0.88% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.78%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NHYB or ZUT?
As of May 8, 2026, NHYB manages $1.45 B in assets, while ZUT manages $875.01 M. NHYB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NHYB and ZUT managed?
NHYB is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NHYB or ZUT?
Year to date, NHYB has seen +$82.07 M in net flows, compared with -$61.61 M for ZUT. NHYB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NHYB and ZUT compare?
NHYB has an expense ratio of 0.68%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Which ETF is more diversified: NHYB or ZUT?
NHYB holds 1 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about NHYB and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds