VS
When evaluating costs, NPRF features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.65% for PR. Performance-wise, NPRF has returned 1.48% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas PR is at 3.07% with +$13 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NPRF
PR
| AuM | $166.54 M | $97.02 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.49% | 0.90% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NPRF | -0.58% | -1.80% | +1.48% | +3.33% | +46.40% |
PR | -0.39% | -0.62% | +3.07% | +4.76% | +51.79% | |
| Flows | NPRF | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$7 M | +$7 M | -$8 M |
PR | +$0 M | +$3 M | +$13 M | +$13 M | +$7 M |
NPRF vs PR exposure
Countries
NPRF
Exposure data will be available soon
PR
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
NPRF
Exposure data will be available soon
PR
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NPRF
Exposure data will be available soon
PR
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
NPRF
Exposure data will be available soon
PR
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
NPRF
PR
| Provider | National Bank Investments | Lysander Funds |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 5.09% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 8, 2019 | August 18, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about NPRF and PR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NPRF or PR?
As of October 19, 2026, NPRF has returned 1.48% year to date, while PR has returned 3.07%. PR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NPRF or PR?
As of October 19, 2026, NPRF manages $166.54 M in assets, while PR manages $97.02 M. NPRF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NPRF and PR managed?
NPRF is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index. PR is actively managed by Lysander Funds. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NPRF or PR?
Year to date, NPRF has seen +$6.70 M in net flows, compared with +$12.96 M for PR. PR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NPRF and PR compare?
NPRF has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while PR has an expense ratio of 0.90%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.