VS
When evaluating costs, NRGD features a management fee (MER) of 1.85%, compared to 1.5% for HQD. Performance-wise, NRGD has returned 68.5% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas HQD is at 51.04% with -$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NRGD
HQD
| AuM | $3.85 M | $24.52 M |
| Management Fees | 1.85% | 1.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 2.06% | 1.57% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NRGD | -20.53% | -26.47% | -68.50% | -72.26% | -83.02% |
HQD | +4.85% | -13.26% | -51.04% | -48.95% | -85.37% | |
| Flows | NRGD | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$4 M | +$2 M |
HQD | -$4 M | -$4 M | -$4 M | -$6 M | +$39 M |
NRGD vs HQD exposure
Countries
NRGD
Exposure data will be available soon
HQD
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
NRGD
Exposure data will be available soon
HQD
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NRGD
Exposure data will be available soon
HQD
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
NRGD
Exposure data will be available soon
HQD
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
NRGD
HQD
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Other | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 18, 2007 | June 17, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about NRGD and HQD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGD or HQD?
As of October 27, 2026, NRGD has returned -68.50% year to date, while HQD has returned -51.04%. HQD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGD or HQD?
As of October 27, 2026, NRGD manages $3.85 M in assets, while HQD manages $24.52 M. HQD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGD and HQD managed?
NRGD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HQD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGD or HQD?
Year to date, NRGD has seen +$3.93 M in net flows, compared with -$3.82 M for HQD. NRGD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGD and HQD compare?
NRGD has an expense ratio of 2.06%, while HQD has an expense ratio of 1.57%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.