VS
When evaluating costs, NRGI features a management fee (MER) of 1.5%, compared to 0.65% for CIF. Performance-wise, NRGI has returned 37.29% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas CIF is at 22.5% with +$455 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NRGI
CIF
| AuM | $130.01 M | $1,606.51 M |
| Management Fees | 1.50% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 3.40% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NRGI | +3.46% | +7.43% | +37.29% | +49.26% | +36.06% |
CIF | +2.97% | -3.39% | +22.50% | +19.95% | +112.61% | |
| Flows | NRGI | +$2 M | +$10 M | +$32 M | +$19 M | -$18 M |
CIF | +$33 M | +$74 M | +$455 M | +$531 M | +$823 M |
NRGI vs CIF exposure
Countries
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
USA
38.98%
Canada
35.13%
Brazil
7.63%
Other
18.26%
Sectors
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
Utilities
42.00%
Energy
28.71%
Industrials
25.55%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.17%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.68%
Enel Chile SA
4.23%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.95%
Edison International
3.80%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.64%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.44%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.38%
UGI Corp.
3.32%
Keyera Corp.
3.27%
Diversification
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
38.88%
Characteristics
Compare
NRGI
CIF
| Provider | Ninepoint Partners | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.26% | 1.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 7, 2022 | August 27, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about NRGI and CIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGI or CIF?
As of October 16, 2026, NRGI has returned 37.29% year to date, while CIF has returned 22.50%. NRGI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGI or CIF?
As of October 16, 2026, NRGI manages $130.01 M in assets, while CIF manages $1.61 B. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGI and CIF managed?
NRGI is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index. CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGI or CIF?
Year to date, NRGI has seen +$31.75 M in net flows, compared with +$455.34 M for CIF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGI and CIF compare?
NRGI has an expense ratio of 3.40%, while CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
Recent articles about NRGI and CIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.