VS
When evaluating costs, NRGI features a management fee (MER) of 1.5%, compared to 0.7% for CINF. Performance-wise, NRGI has returned 37.29% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas CINF is at 12.96% with +$35 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NRGI
CINF
| AuM | $130.01 M | $466.73 M |
| Management Fees | 1.50% | 0.70% |
| Exp. ratio | 3.40% | 0.90% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NRGI | +3.46% | +7.43% | +37.29% | +49.26% | +36.06% |
CINF | +0.05% | -3.79% | +12.96% | +9.15% | +61.56% | |
| Flows | NRGI | +$2 M | +$10 M | +$32 M | +$19 M | -$18 M |
CINF | +$10 M | +$25 M | +$35 M | +$37 M | +$57 M |
NRGI vs CINF exposure
Countries
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
NRGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
NRGI
CINF
| Provider | Ninepoint Partners | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.26% | 2.53% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 7, 2022 | May 12, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about NRGI and CINF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NRGI or CINF?
As of October 19, 2026, NRGI has returned 37.29% year to date, while CINF has returned 12.96%. NRGI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NRGI or CINF?
As of October 19, 2026, NRGI manages $130.01 M in assets, while CINF manages $466.73 M. CINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NRGI and CINF managed?
NRGI is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index. CINF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NRGI or CINF?
Year to date, NRGI has seen +$31.75 M in net flows, compared with +$34.82 M for CINF. CINF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NRGI and CINF compare?
NRGI has an expense ratio of 3.40%, while CINF has an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Recent articles about NRGI and CINF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.