VS
When evaluating costs, NUBF features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.25% for FCCB. Performance-wise, NUBF has returned 5.35% year-to-date with +$219 M in net flows, whereas FCCB is at 0.23% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NUBF
FCCB
| AuM | $2,971.64 M | $4,828.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.78% | 0.29% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.29% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NUBF | -1.44% | -3.28% | -5.35% | -6.29% | +0.92% |
FCCB | -0.50% | -1.45% | -0.23% | -1.33% | +15.12% | |
| Flows | NUBF | +$6 M | +$126 M | +$219 M | +$267 M | +$625 M |
FCCB | +$177 M | +$493 M | +$1,940 M | +$2,494 M | +$4,666 M |
NUBF vs FCCB exposure
Countries
NUBF
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
NUBF
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NUBF
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
NUBF
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCB
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
NUBF
FCCB
| Provider | National Bank Investments | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada Systematic Canadian Bond GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 3.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 18, 2019 | September 25, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about NUBF and FCCB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NUBF or FCCB?
As of October 19, 2026, NUBF has returned -5.35% year to date, while FCCB has returned -0.23%. FCCB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NUBF or FCCB?
As of October 19, 2026, NUBF manages $2.97 B in assets, while FCCB manages $4.83 B. FCCB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NUBF and FCCB managed?
NUBF is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index. FCCB is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Systematic Canadian Bond GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NUBF or FCCB?
Year to date, NUBF has seen +$219.21 M in net flows, compared with +$1,939.89 M for FCCB. FCCB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NUBF and FCCB compare?
NUBF has an expense ratio of 0.78%, while FCCB has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Recent articles about NUBF and FCCB
A Guide to Active vs Passive ETFs for Canadian Investors
Discover the difference between active and passive ETFs in this comprehensive guide. Learn about their strategies, advantages, drawbacks, and how to combine both for a balanced investment approach.
Posted on 7/19/2023 by Tony Dong inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.