VS
Compare NBI Active U.S. Equity ETF (NUSA) vs NBI Active U.S. Equity ETF (NUSA.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. NUSA and NUSA.F provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, NUSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for NUSA.F. Performance-wise, NUSA has returned 10.05% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas NUSA.F is at 5.28% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NUSA
NUSA.F
| AuM | $92.46 M | $1.08 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.63% | 0.55% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NUSA | +3.78% | +3.52% | +10.05% | +9.56% | +56.10% |
NUSA.F | +2.51% | +2.41% | +5.28% | +6.81% | - | |
| Flows | NUSA | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$1 M | -$3 M | +$45 M |
NUSA.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | - |
NUSA vs NUSA.F exposure
Countries
NUSA
USA
95.59%
NUSA.F
USA
95.59%
Sectors
NUSA
Technology
47.66%
Finance
13.04%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.91%
Healthcare
9.10%
Other
19.29%
NUSA.F
Technology
47.66%
Finance
13.04%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.91%
Healthcare
9.10%
Other
19.29%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NUSA
NVIDIA Corp.
9.37%
Microsoft Corp.
8.51%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.37%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.22%
Broadcom Inc.
4.75%
Apple, Inc.
4.03%
Lam Research Corp.
3.83%
Valero Energy Corp.
3.71%
Danaher Corp.
3.63%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.61%
NUSA.F
NVIDIA Corp.
9.37%
Microsoft Corp.
8.51%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.37%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.22%
Broadcom Inc.
4.75%
Apple, Inc.
4.03%
Lam Research Corp.
3.83%
Valero Energy Corp.
3.71%
Danaher Corp.
3.63%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.61%
Diversification
NUSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 32 total
54.03%
NUSA.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 32 total
54.03%
Characteristics
Compare
NUSA
NUSA.F
| Provider | National Bank Investments | National Bank Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 13, 2021 | September 16, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about NUSA and NUSA.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NUSA or NUSA.F?
As of October 16, 2026, NUSA has returned 10.05% year to date, while NUSA.F has returned 5.28%. NUSA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NUSA or NUSA.F?
As of October 16, 2026, NUSA manages $92.46 M in assets, while NUSA.F manages $1.08 M. NUSA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NUSA and NUSA.F managed?
NUSA is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index. NUSA.F is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do NUSA and NUSA.F emphasize?
NUSA is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. NUSA.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NUSA or NUSA.F?
Year to date, NUSA has seen -$0.70 M in net flows, compared with +$0.00 M for NUSA.F. NUSA.F has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NUSA and NUSA.F compare?
NUSA has an expense ratio of 0.63%, while NUSA.F has an expense ratio of 0.55%.
What are the top holdings of NUSA and NUSA.F?
NUSA's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc.. NUSA.F's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: NUSA or NUSA.F?
NUSA holds 32 securities, while NUSA.F holds 32. On holdings count, NUSA is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.