VS
Compare Harvest NVIDIA High Income Shares ETF (NVDH) vs Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF (MSFH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. NVDH and MSFH provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology. When evaluating costs, NVDH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.4% for MSFH. Performance-wise, NVDH has returned 12.71% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas MSFH is at 16.05% with +$32 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NVDH
MSFH
| AuM | $36.07 M | $45.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NVDH | -3.55% | +12.71% | +12.71% | +44.32% | - |
MSFH | -0.88% | +0.08% | -16.05% | -13.43% | - | |
| Flows | NVDH | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$10 M | - |
MSFH | +$5 M | +$15 M | +$32 M | +$38 M | - |
NVDH vs MSFH exposure
Countries
NVDH
USA
101.00%
MSFH
USA
100.80%
Sectors
NVDH
Information Technology
101.00%
MSFH
Information Technology
100.80%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NVDH
NVIDIA
101.00%
MSFH
MICROSOFT-T
100.80%
Diversification
NVDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
101.00%
MSFH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.80%
Characteristics
Compare
NVDH
MSFH
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 17.06% | 19.12% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 21, 2024 | August 21, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about NVDH and MSFH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NVDH or MSFH?
As of June 12, 2026, NVDH has returned 12.71% year to date, while MSFH has returned -16.05%. NVDH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NVDH or MSFH?
As of June 12, 2026, NVDH manages $36.07 M in assets, while MSFH manages $45.04 M. MSFH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NVDH and MSFH managed?
NVDH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. MSFH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do NVDH and MSFH emphasize?
NVDH is most exposed to Information Technology. MSFH is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NVDH or MSFH?
Year to date, NVDH has seen +$5.66 M in net flows, compared with +$32.07 M for MSFH. MSFH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NVDH and MSFH compare?
NVDH has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while MSFH has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of NVDH and MSFH?
NVDH's largest holdings include NVIDIA. MSFH's top holdings include MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NVDH or MSFH?
NVDH holds 1 securities, while MSFH holds 1. On holdings count, NVDH is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.