VS
Compare Harvest NVIDIA High Income Shares ETF (NVDH) vs Harvest NVIDIA High Income Shares ETF (NVDH.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. NVDH and NVDH.U provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology. When evaluating costs, NVDH features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.4% for NVDH.U. Performance-wise, NVDH has returned 12.71% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas NVDH.U is at 10.64% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NVDH
NVDH.U
| AuM | $36.07 M | $5.58 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NVDH | -3.55% | +12.71% | +12.71% | +44.32% | - |
NVDH.U | -5.50% | +9.86% | +10.64% | +40.45% | - | |
| Flows | NVDH | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$10 M | - |
NVDH.U | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | - |
NVDH vs NVDH.U exposure
Countries
NVDH
USA
101.00%
NVDH.U
USA
101.00%
Sectors
NVDH
Information Technology
101.00%
NVDH.U
Information Technology
101.00%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NVDH
NVIDIA
101.00%
NVDH.U
NVIDIA
101.00%
Diversification
NVDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
101.00%
NVDH.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
101.00%
Characteristics
Compare
NVDH
NVDH.U
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 17.06% | 16.99% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 21, 2024 | August 21, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about NVDH and NVDH.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NVDH or NVDH.U?
As of June 12, 2026, NVDH has returned 12.71% year to date, while NVDH.U has returned 10.64%. NVDH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NVDH or NVDH.U?
As of June 12, 2026, NVDH manages $36.07 M in assets, while NVDH.U manages $5.58 M. NVDH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NVDH and NVDH.U managed?
NVDH is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. NVDH.U is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do NVDH and NVDH.U emphasize?
NVDH is most exposed to Information Technology. NVDH.U is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NVDH or NVDH.U?
Year to date, NVDH has seen +$5.66 M in net flows, compared with +$1.86 M for NVDH.U. NVDH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NVDH and NVDH.U compare?
NVDH has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while NVDH.U has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of NVDH and NVDH.U?
NVDH's largest holdings include NVIDIA. NVDH.U's top holdings include NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: NVDH or NVDH.U?
NVDH holds 1 securities, while NVDH.U holds 1. On holdings count, NVDH is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.