ONEQ
CI ONE Global Equity ETF

Full ONEQ fund page
VS
CEQT
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF

Full CEQT fund page

CI ONE Global Equity ETF (ONEQ) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ONEQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Energy, while CEQT leans towards Financials, Information Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ONEQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.22% for CEQT. Performance-wise, ONEQ has returned 8.66% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas CEQT is at 6.42% with +$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ONEQ
+9.24%+4.42%+8.66%+35.01%+71.31%
CEQT
+8.30%+2.48%+6.42%+31.87%-
Flows
ONEQ
+$3 M+$3 M+$3 M-$7 M-$15 M
CEQT
+$2 M+$13 M+$14 M+$29 M-

ONEQ vs CEQT exposure

Countries

ONEQ
USA
47.69%
Canada
34.11%
Other
18.19%
CEQT
USA
33.99%
Canada
30.75%
Other
35.25%

Sectors

ONEQ
Information Technology
22.02%
Financials
13.59%
Other
10.97%
Energy
10.64%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
34.76%
CEQT
Financials
19.36%
Information Technology
18.19%
Industrials
10.36%
Energy
8.37%
Materials
7.87%
Other
7.79%
Other
28.07%
As of April 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ONEQ
NVIDIA
11.02%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.75%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.67%
LOBLAW COMPANIES
3.29%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.58%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.13%
US8740391003
1.99%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
1.90%
META PLATFORMS
1.73%
USN070592100
1.72%
CEQT
NVIDIA
2.36%
APPLE
2.12%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.06%
MICROSOFT-T
1.58%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.43%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.27%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
1.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.15%
ENBRIDGE
1.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
0.97%

Diversification

ONEQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7,690 total
33.79%
CEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,555 total
15.18%

Characteristics

Compare
ONEQ
CEQT
ProviderCICI
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.54%0.96%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 25, 2015May 17, 2023

Frequently asked questions about ONEQ and CEQT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ONEQ or CEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, ONEQ has returned 8.66% year to date, while CEQT has returned 6.42%. ONEQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ONEQ or CEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, ONEQ manages $56.85 M in assets, while CEQT manages $42.56 M. ONEQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ONEQ and CEQT managed?
ONEQ is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CEQT is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ONEQ and CEQT emphasize?
ONEQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Energy. CEQT is most exposed to Financials, Information Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ONEQ or CEQT?
Year to date, ONEQ has seen +$2.70 M in net flows, compared with +$14.40 M for CEQT. CEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ONEQ and CEQT compare?
ONEQ has an expense ratio of 0.97%, while CEQT has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
What are the top holdings of ONEQ and CEQT?
ONEQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA and SUNCOR ENERGY. CEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ONEQ or CEQT?
ONEQ holds 6714 securities, while CEQT holds 5958. On holdings count, ONEQ is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds