ONEQ
CI ONE Global Equity ETF

Full ONEQ fund page
VS
GEQT
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio

Full GEQT fund page

CI ONE Global Equity ETF (ONEQ) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ONEQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Energy, while GEQT leans towards Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ONEQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.22% for GEQT. Performance-wise, ONEQ has returned 8.66% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas GEQT is at 6.45% with +$27 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

024681012%Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ONEQ
+9.24%+4.42%+8.66%+35.01%+71.31%
GEQT
+12.31%+4.02%+6.45%+33.03%+84.86%
Flows
ONEQ
+$3 M+$3 M+$3 M-$7 M-$15 M
GEQT
+$6 M+$21 M+$27 M+$54 M+$112 M

ONEQ vs GEQT exposure

Countries

ONEQ
USA
47.69%
Canada
34.11%
Other
18.19%
GEQT
USA
41.94%
Canada
33.28%
Other
24.78%

Sectors

ONEQ
Information Technology
22.02%
Financials
13.59%
Other
10.97%
Energy
10.64%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
34.76%
GEQT
Information Technology
31.06%
Financials
27.44%
Industrials
7.86%
Materials
7.53%
Other
26.12%
As of April 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ONEQ
NVIDIA
11.02%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.75%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.67%
LOBLAW COMPANIES
3.29%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.58%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.13%
US8740391003
1.99%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
1.90%
META PLATFORMS
1.73%
USN070592100
1.72%
GEQT
NVIDIA
8.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
3.33%
TORONTO DOMINION
3.05%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.84%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
2.80%
BANK OF MONTREAL
1.85%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
1.70%
BNS
1.66%
ASML HOLDING
1.19%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
1.15%

Diversification

ONEQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7,690 total
33.79%
GEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 845 total
28.22%

Characteristics

Compare
ONEQ
GEQT
ProviderCIiShares
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.54%1.18%
Meets ESG criteriaNoYes
Inception DateSeptember 25, 2015September 11, 2020

Frequently asked questions about ONEQ and GEQT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ONEQ or GEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, ONEQ has returned 8.66% year to date, while GEQT has returned 6.45%. ONEQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ONEQ or GEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, ONEQ manages $56.85 M in assets, while GEQT manages $235.41 M. GEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ONEQ and GEQT managed?
ONEQ is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. GEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ONEQ and GEQT emphasize?
ONEQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Energy. GEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ONEQ or GEQT?
Year to date, ONEQ has seen +$2.70 M in net flows, compared with +$26.90 M for GEQT. GEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ONEQ and GEQT compare?
ONEQ has an expense ratio of 0.97%, while GEQT has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
What are the top holdings of ONEQ and GEQT?
ONEQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA and SUNCOR ENERGY. GEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA and ROYAL BK CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ONEQ or GEQT?
ONEQ holds 6714 securities, while GEQT holds 791. On holdings count, ONEQ is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds