CI ONE Global Equity ETF (ONEQ) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ONEQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Energy, while ZEQT leans towards Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ONEQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.18% for ZEQT. Performance-wise, ONEQ has returned 8.66% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas ZEQT is at 6.42% with +$180 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ONEQ
ZEQT
| AuM | $56.85 M | $690.75 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.97% | 0.20% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONEQ | +9.24% | +4.42% | +8.66% | +35.01% | +71.31% |
ZEQT | +8.85% | +3.00% | +6.42% | +32.11% | +72.37% | |
| Flows | ONEQ | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$3 M | -$7 M | -$15 M |
ZEQT | +$44 M | +$142 M | +$180 M | +$403 M | +$559 M |
ONEQ vs ZEQT exposure
Countries
ONEQ
USA
47.69%
Canada
34.11%
Other
18.19%
ZEQT
USA
47.22%
Canada
24.97%
Other
27.81%
Sectors
ONEQ
Information Technology
22.02%
Financials
13.59%
Other
10.97%
Energy
10.64%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
34.76%
ZEQT
Information Technology
21.46%
Financials
17.99%
Industrials
9.97%
Consumer Discretionary
8.04%
Energy
7.84%
Other
34.70%
As of April 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ONEQ
NVIDIA
11.02%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.75%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.67%
LOBLAW COMPANIES
3.29%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.58%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.13%
US8740391003
1.99%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
1.90%
META PLATFORMS
1.73%
USN070592100
1.72%
ZEQT
NVIDIA
3.31%
APPLE
2.98%
MICROSOFT-T
2.19%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.69%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.62%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.31%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
1.20%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.18%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.15%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.05%
Diversification
ONEQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7,690 total
33.79%
ZEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5,551 total
17.68%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ONEQ and ZEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ONEQ or ZEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, ONEQ has returned 8.66% year to date, while ZEQT has returned 6.42%. ONEQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ONEQ or ZEQT?
As of April 27, 2026, ONEQ manages $56.85 M in assets, while ZEQT manages $690.75 M. ZEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ONEQ and ZEQT managed?
ONEQ is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZEQT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ONEQ and ZEQT emphasize?
ONEQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Energy. ZEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ONEQ or ZEQT?
Year to date, ONEQ has seen +$2.70 M in net flows, compared with +$179.82 M for ZEQT. ZEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ONEQ and ZEQT compare?
ONEQ has an expense ratio of 0.97%, while ZEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%.
What are the top holdings of ONEQ and ZEQT?
ONEQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA and SUNCOR ENERGY. ZEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ONEQ or ZEQT?
ONEQ holds 6714 securities, while ZEQT holds 5143. On holdings count, ONEQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ONEQ and ZEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.