PAVE
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development Index ETF

Full PAVE fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development Index ETF (PAVE) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that PAVE focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, Materials, and Utilities, while HEWB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, PAVE features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
PAVE
-----
HEWB
+4.39%+10.50%+14.90%+62.07%+121.50%
Flows
PAVE
-----
HEWB
+$5 M+$9 M+$12 M+$7 M-$3 M

PAVE vs HEWB exposure

Countries

PAVE
USA
87.88%
Ireland
9.93%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

PAVE
Industrials
68.61%
Materials
19.86%
Other
11.53%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of May 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

PAVE
QUANTA SERVICES
3.59%
SEMPRA ENERGY
3.54%
CSX
3.50%
DEERE
3.34%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC
3.26%
UNION PACIFIC U
3.25%
EATON CORP PLC
3.24%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC
3.23%
FASTENAL
3.17%
NORFOLK SOUTHERN
3.07%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

PAVE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 99 total
33.19%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
PAVE
HEWB
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkIndxx U.S. Infrastructure Development Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield-0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 29, 2026January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about PAVE and HEWB

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PAVE or HEWB?
As of May 11, 2026, PAVE manages $3.07 M in assets, while HEWB manages $289.93 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PAVE and HEWB managed?
PAVE is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development Total Return Index - USD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do PAVE and HEWB emphasize?
PAVE is most exposed to Industrials, Materials, and Utilities. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
How do the fees of PAVE and HEWB compare?
PAVE has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of PAVE and HEWB?
PAVE's largest holdings include QUANTA SERVICES and SEMPRA ENERGY. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: PAVE or HEWB?
PAVE holds 91 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, PAVE is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about PAVE and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds