VS
Purpose Best Ideas Fund ETF (PBI) and CI Invesco Russell 1000 Multifactor Index ETF (IUMF.F) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that PBI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while IUMF.F leans towards Technology, Healthcare, and Finance. When evaluating costs, PBI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.34% for IUMF.F. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PBI
IUMF.F
| AuM | $10.21 M | - |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.34% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.64% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBI | -0.02% | +4.10% | +8.38% | +6.26% | +92.51% |
IUMF.F | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | PBI | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$0 M | -$3 M | -$6 M |
IUMF.F | - | - | - | - | - |
PBI vs IUMF.F exposure
Countries
PBI
USA
81.94%
Other
18.06%
IUMF.F
USA
96.75%
Sectors
PBI
Technology
36.66%
Finance
17.46%
Healthcare
15.55%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.86%
Industrials
9.15%
Other
11.31%
IUMF.F
Technology
42.33%
Healthcare
12.87%
Finance
10.79%
Industrials
10.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.73%
Other
13.68%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PBI
Illumina, Inc.
4.53%
DoorDash, Inc.
4.45%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.21%
Danaher Corp.
3.76%
Microsoft Corp.
3.71%
Block, Inc.
3.68%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.62%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
3.54%
Visa, Inc.
3.52%
Nu Holdings Ltd.
3.40%
IUMF.F
US46138J6192
99.82%
Diversification
PBI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
38.42%
IUMF.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 631 total
99.82%
Characteristics
Compare
PBI
IUMF.F
| Provider | Purpose Investments | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor CAD Hedged Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 29, 2014 | July 13, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about PBI and IUMF.F
How do the fees of PBI and IUMF.F compare?
PBI has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while IUMF.F has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
What sectors do PBI and IUMF.F emphasize?
PBI is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. IUMF.F is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Finance.
How are PBI and IUMF.F managed?
PBI is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. IUMF.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor CAD Hedged Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBI or IUMF.F?
PBI holds 30 securities, while IUMF.F holds 1. On holdings count, PBI is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.