VS
When evaluating costs, PDC features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.1% for XDIV. Performance-wise, PDC has returned 23.44% year-to-date with -$50 M in net flows, whereas XDIV is at 27.83% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PDC
XDIV
| AuM | $1,043.37 M | $6,180.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.10% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.56% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.83% | 1.00% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PDC | +0.18% | +3.45% | +23.44% | +34.12% | +94.60% |
XDIV | +0.42% | +6.71% | +27.83% | +43.65% | +112.00% | |
| Flows | PDC | -$10 M | -$12 M | -$50 M | -$62 M | -$217 M |
XDIV | +$99 M | +$454 M | +$1,370 M | +$1,922 M | +$3,444 M |
PDC vs XDIV exposure
Countries
PDC
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Canada
95.43%
Sectors
PDC
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Finance
47.81%
Energy
28.87%
Utilities
9.39%
Other
13.94%
As of September 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PDC
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Manulife Financial Corp.
9.89%
Royal Bank of Canada
9.62%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
9.33%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
8.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
8.06%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
8.04%
Power Corp of Canada
6.54%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
5.41%
Fortis, Inc.
5.40%
Restaurant Brands International, Inc.
4.41%
Diversification
PDC
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
75.18%
Characteristics
Compare
PDC
XDIV
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Total Return Index - CAD | MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.21% | 3.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 16, 2011 | June 7, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about PDC and XDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PDC or XDIV?
As of September 8, 2026, PDC has returned 23.44% year to date, while XDIV has returned 27.83%. XDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PDC or XDIV?
As of September 8, 2026, PDC manages $1.04 B in assets, while XDIV manages $6.18 B. XDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PDC and XDIV managed?
PDC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XDIV is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PDC or XDIV?
Year to date, PDC has seen -$50.04 M in net flows, compared with +$1,370.11 M for XDIV. XDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PDC and XDIV compare?
PDC has an expense ratio of 0.56%, while XDIV has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about PDC and XDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.