VS
Compare Purpose Core Dividend Fund ETF (PDF) vs CI RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. PDF provides Finance, Energy, and Healthcare exposures, while PXC is primarily weighted in Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, PDF features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.45% for PXC. Performance-wise, PDF has returned 20.88% year-to-date with -$35 M in net flows, whereas PXC is at 24.38% with +$34 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PDF
PXC
| AuM | $252.41 M | $263.89 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | 0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PDF | +2.88% | +0.16% | +20.88% | +25.43% | +75.56% |
PXC | +3.12% | +1.60% | +24.38% | +32.64% | +114.85% | |
| Flows | PDF | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$35 M | +$7 M | +$12 M |
PXC | -$3 M | -$0 M | +$34 M | +$39 M | -$45 M |
PDF vs PXC exposure
Countries
PDF
Canada
69.80%
USA
23.91%
PXC
Canada
98.93%
Sectors
PDF
Finance
35.93%
Energy
14.42%
Healthcare
8.70%
Technology
7.25%
Other
33.71%
PXC
Finance
37.44%
Energy
25.42%
Non-Energy Materials
12.27%
Other
24.88%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PDF
The Bank of Nova Scotia
5.60%
Royal Bank of Canada
5.05%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
4.79%
Manulife Financial Corp.
4.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.77%
Power Corp of Canada
3.47%
TC Energy Corp.
3.09%
Whitecap Resources, Inc.
3.06%
Bank of Montreal
2.97%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.93%
PXC
Royal Bank of Canada
6.27%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.08%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
5.20%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
4.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
4.75%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.36%
Bank of Montreal
3.48%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.35%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
3.21%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.80%
Diversification
PDF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 55 total
39.26%
PXC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 98 total
44.40%
Characteristics
Compare
PDF
PXC
| Provider | Purpose Investments | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.79% | 2.14% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 3, 2013 | January 26, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about PDF and PXC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PDF or PXC?
As of November 2, 2026, PDF has returned 20.88% year to date, while PXC has returned 24.38%. PXC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PDF or PXC?
As of November 2, 2026, PDF manages $252.41 M in assets, while PXC manages $263.89 M. PXC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PDF and PXC managed?
PDF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. PXC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do PDF and PXC emphasize?
PDF is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Healthcare. PXC is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PDF or PXC?
Year to date, PDF has seen -$35.18 M in net flows, compared with +$33.93 M for PXC. PXC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PDF and PXC compare?
PDF has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while PXC has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of PDF and PXC?
PDF's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. PXC's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Suncor Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PDF or PXC?
PDF holds 55 securities, while PXC holds 98. On holdings count, PXC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about PDF and PXC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.