VS
Compare Purpose Core Dividend Fund ETF (PDF) vs Purpose Core Equity Income Fund (RDE) to find the best fit for your portfolio. PDF provides Finance, Energy, and Healthcare exposures, while RDE is primarily weighted in Finance, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, PDF features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.75% for RDE. Performance-wise, PDF has returned 20.88% year-to-date with -$35 M in net flows, whereas RDE is at 25.18% with -$26 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PDF
RDE
| AuM | $252.41 M | $109.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.82% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PDF | +2.88% | +0.16% | +20.88% | +25.43% | +75.56% |
RDE | +2.97% | +2.57% | +25.18% | +29.03% | +86.11% | |
| Flows | PDF | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$35 M | +$7 M | +$12 M |
RDE | -$3 M | +$4 M | -$26 M | +$33 M | +$73 M |
PDF vs RDE exposure
Countries
PDF
Canada
69.80%
USA
23.91%
RDE
Canada
68.18%
USA
22.38%
Other
9.44%
Sectors
PDF
Finance
35.93%
Energy
14.42%
Healthcare
8.70%
Technology
7.25%
Other
33.71%
RDE
Finance
34.58%
Energy
14.01%
Industrials
9.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.36%
Healthcare
8.90%
Non-Energy Materials
8.07%
Other
15.63%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PDF
The Bank of Nova Scotia
5.60%
Royal Bank of Canada
5.05%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
4.79%
Manulife Financial Corp.
4.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.77%
Power Corp of Canada
3.47%
TC Energy Corp.
3.09%
Whitecap Resources, Inc.
3.06%
Bank of Montreal
2.97%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.93%
RDE
The Bank of Nova Scotia
4.80%
Royal Bank of Canada
4.42%
Bank of Montreal
4.37%
Finning International, Inc.
3.96%
Canadian National Railway Co.
3.52%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
3.32%
Manulife Financial Corp.
3.32%
Procter & Gamble Co.
3.29%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.14%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
3.09%
Diversification
PDF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 55 total
39.26%
RDE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
37.21%
Characteristics
Compare
PDF
RDE
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.79% | 5.84% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 3, 2013 | May 11, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about PDF and RDE
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PDF or RDE?
As of November 5, 2026, PDF has returned 20.88% year to date, while RDE has returned 25.18%. RDE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PDF or RDE?
As of November 5, 2026, PDF manages $252.41 M in assets, while RDE manages $109.98 M. PDF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PDF and RDE managed?
PDF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. RDE is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do PDF and RDE emphasize?
PDF is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Healthcare. RDE is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PDF or RDE?
Year to date, PDF has seen -$35.18 M in net flows, compared with -$25.85 M for RDE. RDE has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PDF and RDE compare?
PDF has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while RDE has an expense ratio of 0.82%.
What are the top holdings of PDF and RDE?
PDF's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. RDE's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: PDF or RDE?
PDF holds 55 securities, while RDE holds 38. On holdings count, PDF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about PDF and RDE
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.