VS
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV) and Purpose Core Dividend Fund ETF (PDF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that PDIV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Information Technology, while PDF leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, PDIV features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.55% for PDF. Performance-wise, PDIV has returned 8.05% year-to-date with +$12 M in net flows, whereas PDF is at 16.33% with -$38 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PDIV
PDF
| AuM | $94.09 M | $242.69 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.77% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PDIV | +2.46% | +6.46% | +8.05% | +18.00% | +39.80% |
PDF | +4.86% | +10.37% | +16.33% | +31.02% | +65.85% | |
| Flows | PDIV | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$12 M | +$32 M | +$72 M |
PDF | +$3 M | +$3 M | -$38 M | +$9 M | +$6 M |
PDIV vs PDF exposure
Countries
PDIV
Canada
58.15%
USA
24.48%
Other
16.58%
PDF
Canada
74.41%
USA
22.48%
Sectors
PDIV
Financials
26.33%
Other
16.85%
Energy
14.68%
Information Technology
10.20%
Other
31.94%
PDF
Financials
34.61%
Energy
17.50%
Materials
7.38%
Consumer Discretionary
7.04%
Health Care
7.03%
Other
26.44%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PDIV
TORONTO DOMINION
4.58%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.68%
ROYAL BK CANADA
3.51%
ENBRIDGE
3.51%
MICROSOFT-T
3.51%
BNS
2.77%
MANULIFE-S
2.75%
TC ENERGY CORP
2.66%
NVIDIA
2.61%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.36%
PDF
TORONTO DOMINION
5.80%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
4.85%
ROYAL BK CANADA
4.61%
MANULIFE-S
3.62%
BNS
3.59%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.46%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.08%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
2.94%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.83%
Diversification
PDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 61 total
31.94%
PDF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 54 total
37.94%
Characteristics
Compare
PDIV
PDF
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.78% | 2.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 2, 2018 | September 3, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about PDIV and PDF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PDIV or PDF?
As of June 12, 2026, PDIV has returned 8.05% year to date, while PDF has returned 16.33%. PDF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PDIV or PDF?
As of June 12, 2026, PDIV manages $94.09 M in assets, while PDF manages $242.69 M. PDF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PDIV and PDF managed?
PDIV is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. PDF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do PDIV and PDF emphasize?
PDIV is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Information Technology. PDF is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PDIV or PDF?
Year to date, PDIV has seen +$12.15 M in net flows, compared with -$38.28 M for PDF. PDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PDIV and PDF compare?
PDIV has an expense ratio of 0.77%, while PDF has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of PDIV and PDF?
PDIV's largest holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and ROYAL BK CANADA. PDF's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and ROYAL BK CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: PDIV or PDF?
PDIV holds 61 securities, while PDF holds 54. On holdings count, PDIV is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.