PHE
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF

Full PHE fund page
VS
PHE.B
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF

Full PHE.B fund page

Compare Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF (PHE) vs Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF (PHE.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. PHE and PHE.B provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, PHE features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.95% for PHE.B. Performance-wise, PHE has returned 3.04% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas PHE.B is at 8.38% with -$13 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-5.0-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3Nov 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
PHE
-2.30%-2.34%+3.04%+2.35%+35.92%
PHE.B
-1.46%+0.94%+8.38%+5.88%+47.19%
Flows
PHE
-$1 M-$1 M-$0 M-$0 M-$1 M
PHE.B
+$0 M+$0 M-$13 M-$12 M-$9 M

PHE vs PHE.B exposure

Countries

PHE
USA
95.53%
PHE.B
USA
95.53%

Sectors

PHE
Technology
48.31%
Finance
12.41%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.17%
Industrials
9.12%
Healthcare
7.94%
Other
13.05%
PHE.B
Technology
48.31%
Finance
12.41%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.17%
Industrials
9.12%
Healthcare
7.94%
Other
13.05%
As of November 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

PHE
NVIDIA Corp.
9.62%
Apple, Inc.
8.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.88%
Microsoft Corp.
6.34%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.54%
Broadcom Inc.
3.02%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.47%
Visa, Inc.
2.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.16%
PHE.B
NVIDIA Corp.
9.62%
Apple, Inc.
8.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.88%
Microsoft Corp.
6.34%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.54%
Broadcom Inc.
3.02%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.47%
Visa, Inc.
2.34%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.16%

Diversification

PHE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 81 total
47.39%
PHE.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 81 total
47.39%

Characteristics

Compare
PHE
PHE.B
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsPurpose Investments
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 3, 2013April 29, 2014

Frequently asked questions about PHE and PHE.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: PHE or PHE.B?
As of November 11, 2026, PHE has returned 3.04% year to date, while PHE.B has returned 8.38%. PHE.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PHE or PHE.B?
As of November 11, 2026, PHE manages $3.58 M in assets, while PHE.B manages $10.79 M. PHE.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PHE and PHE.B managed?
PHE is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. PHE.B is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do PHE and PHE.B emphasize?
PHE is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. PHE.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PHE or PHE.B?
Year to date, PHE has seen -$0.04 M in net flows, compared with -$12.97 M for PHE.B. PHE has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PHE and PHE.B compare?
PHE has an expense ratio of 0.98%, while PHE.B has an expense ratio of 0.94%.
What are the top holdings of PHE and PHE.B?
PHE's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. PHE.B's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PHE or PHE.B?
PHE holds 81 securities, while PHE.B holds 81. On holdings count, PHE is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds