VS
When evaluating costs, PRA features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.65% for FIE. Performance-wise, PRA has returned 27.49% year-to-date with +$152 M in net flows, whereas FIE is at 16.99% with -$47 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PRA
FIE
| AuM | $284.59 M | $1,395.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.74% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRA | +0.17% | +1.86% | +27.49% | +30.14% | +70.14% |
FIE | +1.63% | -1.71% | +16.99% | +24.55% | +121.70% | |
| Flows | PRA | +$24 M | +$49 M | +$152 M | +$164 M | +$175 M |
FIE | -$9 M | -$13 M | -$47 M | -$49 M | -$155 M |
PRA vs FIE exposure
Countries
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
FIE
Canada
98.00%
Sectors
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
FIE
Finance
84.74%
Other
15.26%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
FIE
CA46431G2053
20.55%
CA46430K1084
9.94%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.15%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
8.12%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
7.26%
Manulife Financial Corp.
6.82%
Bank of Montreal
6.37%
National Bank of Canada
6.15%
Power Corp of Canada
4.04%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
3.60%
Diversification
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
FIE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,514 total
81.00%
Characteristics
Compare
PRA
FIE
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Commodity, Currencies, Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.07% | 4.27% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 5, 2013 | April 16, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about PRA and FIE
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PRA or FIE?
As of October 28, 2026, PRA has returned 27.49% year to date, while FIE has returned 16.99%. PRA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PRA or FIE?
As of October 28, 2026, PRA manages $284.59 M in assets, while FIE manages $1.40 B. FIE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PRA and FIE managed?
PRA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. FIE is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PRA or FIE?
Year to date, PRA has seen +$152.36 M in net flows, compared with -$47.41 M for FIE. PRA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PRA and FIE compare?
PRA has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while FIE has an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Recent articles about PRA and FIE
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.