VS
When evaluating costs, PRA features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for ZBI. Performance-wise, PRA has returned 27.49% year-to-date with +$152 M in net flows, whereas ZBI is at 2.03% with +$83 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PRA
ZBI
| AuM | $284.59 M | $247.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.27% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.26% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRA | +0.17% | +1.86% | +27.49% | +30.14% | +70.14% |
ZBI | -0.02% | -0.14% | +2.03% | +2.45% | +26.62% | |
| Flows | PRA | +$24 M | +$49 M | +$152 M | +$164 M | +$175 M |
ZBI | +$23 M | +$77 M | +$83 M | +$118 M | +$231 M |
PRA vs ZBI exposure
Countries
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Finance
100.00%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 3.6% 31oct2081, CAD (1)
3.26%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 7.283% 31oct2082, CAD (2)
3.02%
Bank of Nova Scotia, 7.023% 27jul2082, CAD
2.99%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.918% 31jul2086, CAD (7)
2.50%
Bank of Nova Scotia, 3.7% 27jul2081, CAD (1)
2.49%
Bank of Montreal, 7.325% 26nov2082, CAD (3)
2.06%
Royal Bank of Canada, 3.65% 24nov2081, CAD (3)
1.83%
CIBC, 7.15% 28jul2082, CAD (3)
1.63%
Bank of Montreal, 5.625% 26may2082, CAD (2)
1.47%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.909% 31jan2085, CAD (5)
1.46%
Diversification
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 166 total
22.72%
Characteristics
Compare
PRA
ZBI
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Canada Bank Income Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity, Currencies, Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.07% | 4.51% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 5, 2013 | January 17, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about PRA and ZBI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PRA or ZBI?
As of October 28, 2026, PRA has returned 27.49% year to date, while ZBI has returned 2.03%. PRA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PRA or ZBI?
As of October 28, 2026, PRA manages $284.59 M in assets, while ZBI manages $247.43 M. PRA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PRA and ZBI managed?
PRA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZBI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Canada Bank Income Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PRA or ZBI?
Year to date, PRA has seen +$152.36 M in net flows, compared with +$83.18 M for ZBI. PRA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PRA and ZBI compare?
PRA has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while ZBI has an expense ratio of 0.27%.
Recent articles about PRA and ZBI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.