VS
When evaluating costs, PRA features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, PRA has returned 21.61% year-to-date with +$76 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 10.3% with +$566 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PRA
ZSP
| AuM | $200.91 M | $23,784.53 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.22% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRA | -3.06% | +1.90% | +21.61% | +36.32% | +65.85% |
ZSP | +1.90% | +12.40% | +10.30% | +26.61% | +83.75% | |
| Flows | PRA | +$8 M | +$41 M | +$76 M | +$95 M | +$87 M |
ZSP | +$89 M | +$283 M | +$566 M | +$1,532 M | +$5,079 M |
PRA vs ZSP exposure
Countries
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%
Sectors
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%
Diversification
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%
Characteristics
Compare
PRA
ZSP
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Commodity, Currencies, Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.14% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 5, 2013 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about PRA and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PRA or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, PRA has returned 21.61% year to date, while ZSP has returned 10.30%. PRA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PRA or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, PRA manages $200.91 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.78 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PRA and ZSP managed?
PRA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PRA or ZSP?
Year to date, PRA has seen +$76.02 M in net flows, compared with +$565.61 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PRA and ZSP compare?
PRA has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about PRA and ZSP
A Guide to Active vs Passive ETFs for Canadian Investors
Discover the difference between active and passive ETFs in this comprehensive guide. Learn about their strategies, advantages, drawbacks, and how to combine both for a balanced investment approach.
Posted on 7/19/2023 by Tony Dong inETF Ecosystem
BMO ETF Spotlight - More than Just a Bank
BMO is more than just a bank, learn more about BMO’s extensive ETF offerings.
Posted on 3/22/2023 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.