VS
Purpose Conservative Income Fund ETF (PRP) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that PRP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Energy, while XIC leans towards Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, PRP features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, PRP has returned 4.72% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 12.78% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PRP
XIC
| AuM | $1.03 M | $31,737.82 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.86% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRP | +1.20% | +2.75% | +4.72% | +7.93% | +19.30% |
XIC | +1.64% | +4.55% | +12.78% | +31.22% | +85.86% | |
| Flows | PRP | -$0 M | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M |
XIC | +$945 M | +$1,839 M | +$6,880 M | +$8,197 M | +$12,994 M |
PRP vs XIC exposure
Countries
PRP
USA
40.56%
Other
37.72%
Canada
19.62%
XIC
Canada
96.25%
Sectors
PRP
Other
37.72%
Finance
12.71%
Other
49.57%
XIC
Finance
42.08%
Energy
16.27%
Non-Energy Materials
15.91%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
17.49%
As of July 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PRP
CA74642H1010
20.93%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.43%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.15%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.10%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.05%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
1.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
0.97%
Manulife Financial Corp.
0.90%
TC Energy Corp.
0.89%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
0.82%
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.77%
Shopify, Inc.
3.97%
Bank of Montreal
3.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.36%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.04%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.01%
Brookfield Corp.
2.59%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.35%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.25%
Diversification
PRP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,572 total
30.25%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
38.08%
Characteristics
Compare
PRP
XIC
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.92% | 1.99% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 26, 2016 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about PRP and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PRP or XIC?
As of July 29, 2026, PRP has returned 4.72% year to date, while XIC has returned 12.78%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PRP or XIC?
As of July 29, 2026, PRP manages $1.03 M in assets, while XIC manages $31.74 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PRP and XIC managed?
PRP is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do PRP and XIC emphasize?
PRP is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Energy. XIC is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PRP or XIC?
Year to date, PRP has seen -$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$6,879.87 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PRP and XIC compare?
PRP has an expense ratio of 0.86%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of PRP and XIC?
PRP's largest holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. XIC's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Shopify, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PRP or XIC?
PRP holds 1128 securities, while XIC holds 219. On holdings count, PRP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about PRP and XIC
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.