VS
When evaluating costs, PSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.15% for HISA. Performance-wise, PSA has returned 0.67% year-to-date with -$180 M in net flows, whereas HISA is at 0.65% with +$100 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PSA
HISA
| AuM | $3,028.17 M | $1,309.94 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSA | +0.18% | +0.52% | +0.67% | +2.40% | +11.94% |
HISA | +0.18% | +0.50% | +0.65% | +2.34% | +11.76% | |
| Flows | PSA | -$5 M | -$100 M | -$180 M | -$358 M | -$661 M |
HISA | +$78 M | +$75 M | +$100 M | -$82 M | -$131 M |
PSA vs HISA exposure
Countries
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
PSA
HISA
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.41% | 2.35% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 10, 2013 | November 21, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about PSA and HISA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PSA or HISA?
As of April 24, 2026, PSA has returned 0.67% year to date, while HISA has returned 0.65%. PSA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PSA or HISA?
As of April 24, 2026, PSA manages $3.03 B in assets, while HISA manages $1.31 B. PSA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PSA and HISA managed?
PSA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. HISA is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PSA or HISA?
Year to date, PSA has seen -$179.97 M in net flows, compared with +$100.34 M for HISA. HISA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PSA and HISA compare?
PSA has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while HISA has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about PSA and HISA
High Interest Cash ETFs: All You Need to Know Heading Into 2024
Interest in these ETFs has persisted throughout 2023 amid a "higher for longer" interest rate environment.
Posted on 12/11/2023 by Jean-Charles Senant inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.