PXC
CI RAFI Canadian Index ETF

Full PXC fund page
VS
CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page

Compare CI RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC) vs iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) to find the best fit for your portfolio. PXC and CRQ provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, PXC features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.65% for CRQ. Performance-wise, PXC has returned 24.38% year-to-date with +$34 M in net flows, whereas CRQ is at 22.02% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Oct 2Oct 9Oct 19Oct 26Nov 2

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
PXC
+3.12%+1.60%+24.38%+32.64%+114.85%
CRQ
+1.82%+0.39%+22.02%+30.60%+109.24%
Flows
PXC
-$3 M-$0 M+$34 M+$39 M-$45 M
CRQ
+$2 M+$6 M+$16 M+$18 M+$2 M

PXC vs CRQ exposure

Countries

PXC
Canada
98.93%
CRQ
Canada
98.25%

Sectors

PXC
Finance
37.44%
Energy
25.42%
Non-Energy Materials
12.27%
Other
24.88%
CRQ
Finance
37.21%
Energy
25.21%
Non-Energy Materials
12.18%
Other
25.40%
As of November 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

PXC
Royal Bank of Canada
6.27%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.08%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
5.20%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
4.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
4.75%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.36%
Bank of Montreal
3.48%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.35%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
3.21%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.80%
CRQ
Royal Bank of Canada
6.24%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.05%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
5.18%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
4.83%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
4.72%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.34%
Bank of Montreal
3.47%
Nutrien Ltd.
3.30%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
3.19%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.77%

Diversification

PXC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 98 total
44.40%
CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 98 total
44.09%

Characteristics

Compare
PXC
CRQ
ProviderCIiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkRAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CADRAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index TR - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.14%1.74%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 26, 2012February 22, 2006

Frequently asked questions about PXC and CRQ

Which ETF has performed better year to date: PXC or CRQ?
As of November 2, 2026, PXC has returned 24.38% year to date, while CRQ has returned 22.02%. PXC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PXC or CRQ?
As of November 2, 2026, PXC manages $263.89 M in assets, while CRQ manages $156.02 M. PXC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PXC and CRQ managed?
PXC is passively managed by CI. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index - CAD benchmark. CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Canada 100 Index TR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do PXC and CRQ emphasize?
PXC is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. CRQ is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PXC or CRQ?
Year to date, PXC has seen +$33.93 M in net flows, compared with +$15.98 M for CRQ. PXC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PXC and CRQ compare?
PXC has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of PXC and CRQ?
PXC's largest holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Suncor Energy, Inc.. CRQ's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Suncor Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PXC or CRQ?
PXC holds 98 securities, while CRQ holds 98. On holdings count, PXC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about PXC and CRQ

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds