VS
Compare Purpose Premium Yield Fund ETF (PYF) vs Purpose Premium Yield Fund ETF (PYF.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. PYF and PYF.U provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Sovereign. When evaluating costs, PYF features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.73% for PYF.U. Performance-wise, PYF has returned 3.69% year-to-date with -$80 M in net flows, whereas PYF.U is at 5.68% with -$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PYF
PYF.U
| AuM | $311.56 M | $6.26 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.73% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.78% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PYF | +0.42% | +2.69% | +3.69% | +3.05% | +20.39% |
PYF.U | +1.62% | +4.80% | +5.68% | +6.50% | +20.19% | |
| Flows | PYF | -$36 M | -$61 M | -$80 M | +$16 M | +$209 M |
PYF.U | -$0 M | -$2 M | -$3 M | -$4 M | +$1 M |
PYF vs PYF.U exposure
Countries
PYF
Other
86.39%
USA
11.86%
PYF.U
Other
86.39%
USA
11.86%
Sectors
PYF
Other
86.39%
Other
13.61%
PYF.U
Other
86.39%
Other
13.61%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PYF
CA74643B1031
85.04%
Microsoft Corp.
1.79%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.24%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.21%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.14%
Salesforce, Inc.
0.87%
Oracle Corp.
0.67%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
0.65%
ServiceNow, Inc.
0.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.45%
PYF.U
CA74643B1031
85.04%
Microsoft Corp.
1.79%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.24%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.21%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.14%
Salesforce, Inc.
0.87%
Oracle Corp.
0.67%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
0.65%
ServiceNow, Inc.
0.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.45%
Diversification
PYF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 350 total
93.58%
PYF.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 350 total
93.58%
Characteristics
Compare
PYF
PYF.U
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.28% | 6.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 19, 2016 | November 27, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about PYF and PYF.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PYF or PYF.U?
As of September 3, 2026, PYF has returned 3.69% year to date, while PYF.U has returned 5.68%. PYF.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PYF or PYF.U?
As of September 3, 2026, PYF manages $311.56 M in assets, while PYF.U manages $6.26 M. PYF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PYF and PYF.U managed?
PYF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. PYF.U is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do PYF and PYF.U emphasize?
PYF is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Sovereign. PYF.U is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Sovereign.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PYF or PYF.U?
Year to date, PYF has seen -$79.57 M in net flows, compared with -$3.25 M for PYF.U. PYF.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PYF and PYF.U compare?
PYF has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while PYF.U has an expense ratio of 0.78%.
What are the top holdings of PYF and PYF.U?
PYF's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp. and Procter & Gamble Co.. PYF.U's top holdings include Microsoft Corp. and Procter & Gamble Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: PYF or PYF.U?
PYF holds 350 securities, while PYF.U holds 350. On holdings count, PYF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.