VS
Compare Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QAH) vs CI U.S. 500 Index ETF (CUSA.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QAH and CUSA.B provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, QAH features a management fee (MER) of 0.06%, compared to 0.08% for CUSA.B. Performance-wise, QAH has returned 7.96% year-to-date with +$207 M in net flows, whereas CUSA.B is at 12.39% with +$25 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QAH
CUSA.B
| AuM | $1,193.45 M | $293.26 M |
| Management Fees | 0.06% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.07% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.03% | -0.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QAH | -1.19% | +2.99% | +7.96% | +15.68% | +62.79% |
CUSA.B | -1.15% | +7.27% | +12.39% | +20.57% | +80.84% | |
| Flows | QAH | +$36 M | -$19 M | +$207 M | +$389 M | +$968 M |
CUSA.B | -$2 M | -$2 M | +$25 M | +$41 M | +$36 M |
QAH vs CUSA.B exposure
Countries
QAH
USA
97.63%
CUSA.B
USA
97.34%
Sectors
QAH
Technology
45.00%
Finance
12.93%
Healthcare
9.06%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.74%
Industrials
8.24%
Other
16.03%
CUSA.B
Technology
45.69%
Finance
12.85%
Healthcare
8.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.70%
Industrials
8.15%
Other
15.82%
As of July 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QAH
NVIDIA Corp.
7.07%
Apple, Inc.
6.25%
Microsoft Corp.
4.19%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.19%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Broadcom Inc.
2.68%
Tesla, Inc.
2.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
CUSA.B
NVIDIA Corp.
7.19%
Apple, Inc.
6.37%
Microsoft Corp.
4.21%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.75%
Broadcom Inc.
2.70%
Tesla, Inc.
2.16%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
Diversification
QAH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
35.78%
CUSA.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 507 total
36.00%
Characteristics
Compare
QAH
CUSA.B
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.82% | 0.86% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 29, 2018 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about QAH and CUSA.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QAH or CUSA.B?
As of July 30, 2026, QAH has returned 7.96% year to date, while CUSA.B has returned 12.39%. CUSA.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QAH or CUSA.B?
As of July 30, 2026, QAH manages $1.19 B in assets, while CUSA.B manages $293.26 M. QAH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QAH and CUSA.B managed?
QAH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark. CUSA.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QAH and CUSA.B emphasize?
QAH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. CUSA.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QAH or CUSA.B?
Year to date, QAH has seen +$206.51 M in net flows, compared with +$24.86 M for CUSA.B. QAH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QAH and CUSA.B compare?
QAH has an expense ratio of 0.07%, while CUSA.B has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of QAH and CUSA.B?
QAH's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. CUSA.B's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QAH or CUSA.B?
QAH holds 497 securities, while CUSA.B holds 498. On holdings count, CUSA.B is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QAH and CUSA.B
CI Global Asset Management launches the CI U.S. 500 Index ETF
The currency-hedged ETF provides low-cost exposure to the U.S. stock market.
Posted on 5/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.