VS
Compare Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDXH) vs Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QDXH and FLUR provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, QDXH features a management fee (MER) of 0.17%, compared to 0.09% for FLUR. Performance-wise, QDXH has returned 11.95% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas FLUR is at 11.53% with +$83 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QDXH
FLUR
| AuM | $40.09 M | $586.87 M |
| Management Fees | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.22% | -0.27% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QDXH | +0.81% | +4.73% | +11.95% | +25.59% | +61.02% |
FLUR | -1.69% | +3.07% | +11.53% | +23.47% | +64.07% | |
| Flows | QDXH | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | -$0 M | +$15 M |
FLUR | +$12 M | +$68 M | +$83 M | +$133 M | +$272 M |
QDXH vs FLUR exposure
Countries
QDXH
Japan
25.90%
United Kingdom
13.26%
Switzerland
8.98%
Germany
8.41%
France
7.91%
Australia
7.22%
Other
28.32%
FLUR
Japan
21.14%
United Kingdom
14.37%
Switzerland
9.53%
Germany
9.08%
France
8.56%
Australia
7.71%
Other
29.62%
Sectors
QDXH
Finance
26.25%
Industrials
16.54%
Technology
12.24%
Healthcare
9.81%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.22%
Non-Energy Materials
7.44%
Other
19.49%
FLUR
Finance
27.50%
Industrials
15.97%
Technology
11.46%
Healthcare
10.10%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.14%
Non-Energy Materials
7.17%
Other
19.65%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QDXH
ASML Holding NV
2.77%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.46%
Roche Holding AG
1.34%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.26%
Novartis AG
1.23%
Nestlé SA
1.18%
Shell Plc
1.07%
Siemens AG
1.02%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.01%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%
FLUR
ASML Holding NV
2.93%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.58%
Roche Holding AG
1.44%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.38%
Novartis AG
1.34%
Nestlé SA
1.29%
Shell Plc
1.15%
Siemens AG
1.12%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.06%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.04%
Diversification
QDXH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 896 total
13.30%
FLUR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 696 total
14.33%
Characteristics
Compare
QDXH
FLUR
| Provider | Mackenzie Investments | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Hedged to CAD Index - CAD | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.30% | 1.79% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 29, 2018 | February 20, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about QDXH and FLUR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QDXH or FLUR?
As of July 16, 2026, QDXH has returned 11.95% year to date, while FLUR has returned 11.53%. QDXH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QDXH or FLUR?
As of July 16, 2026, QDXH manages $40.09 M in assets, while FLUR manages $586.87 M. FLUR is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QDXH and FLUR managed?
QDXH is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Hedged to CAD Index - CAD benchmark. FLUR is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do QDXH and FLUR emphasize?
QDXH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. FLUR is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QDXH or FLUR?
Year to date, QDXH has seen +$1.58 M in net flows, compared with +$82.96 M for FLUR. FLUR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QDXH and FLUR compare?
QDXH has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while FLUR has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of QDXH and FLUR?
QDXH's largest holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG. FLUR's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: QDXH or FLUR?
QDXH holds 880 securities, while FLUR holds 685. On holdings count, QDXH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QDXH and FLUR
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.