VS
Compare AGF Systematic Global ESG Factors ETF (QEF) vs Manulife Global Edge ETF (GEDG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QEF provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while GEDG is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, QEF features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.5% for GEDG. Performance-wise, QEF has returned 11.06% year-to-date with -$7 M in net flows, whereas GEDG is at 8.94% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QEF
GEDG
| AuM | $112.58 M | $27.69 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QEF | -2.41% | +1.95% | +11.06% | +10.00% | +69.93% |
GEDG | -1.67% | +3.34% | +8.94% | - | - | |
| Flows | QEF | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$7 M | -$10 M | -$44 M |
GEDG | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$16 M | - | - |
QEF vs GEDG exposure
Countries
QEF
USA
60.11%
Other
39.89%
GEDG
USA
64.88%
Other
35.12%
Sectors
QEF
Technology
38.85%
Finance
21.39%
Industrials
8.02%
Healthcare
7.90%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.25%
Other
16.58%
GEDG
Technology
44.09%
Finance
14.60%
Healthcare
10.60%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.41%
Industrials
7.81%
Other
13.49%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QEF
NVIDIA Corp.
6.19%
Apple, Inc.
5.01%
Microsoft Corp.
4.11%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.49%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.37%
Broadcom Inc.
2.00%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.57%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.37%
GEDG
NVIDIA Corp.
6.49%
Microsoft Corp.
5.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.91%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.04%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.96%
Apple, Inc.
3.33%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.92%
Broadcom Inc.
2.89%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.65%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.43%
Diversification
QEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 132 total
29.20%
GEDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 62 total
38.76%
Characteristics
Compare
QEF
GEDG
| Provider | AGF | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.16% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | February 12, 2018 | November 24, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about QEF and GEDG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QEF or GEDG?
As of October 29, 2026, QEF has returned 11.06% year to date, while GEDG has returned 8.94%. QEF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QEF or GEDG?
As of October 29, 2026, QEF manages $112.58 M in assets, while GEDG manages $27.69 M. QEF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QEF and GEDG managed?
QEF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. GEDG is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do QEF and GEDG emphasize?
QEF is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. GEDG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QEF or GEDG?
Year to date, QEF has seen -$7.14 M in net flows, compared with +$16.01 M for GEDG. GEDG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QEF and GEDG compare?
QEF has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while GEDG has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of QEF and GEDG?
QEF's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. GEDG's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QEF or GEDG?
QEF holds 130 securities, while GEDG holds 62. On holdings count, QEF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.