VS
Compare AGF Systematic Global ESG Factors ETF (QEF) vs JPMorgan Global Select Equity Active ETF (CA) (JGLO) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QEF provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while JGLO is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, QEF features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.47% for JGLO. Performance-wise, QEF has returned 11.06% year-to-date with -$7 M in net flows, whereas JGLO is at 6.21% with +$215 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QEF
JGLO
| AuM | $112.58 M | $258.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.47% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.47% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QEF | -2.41% | +1.95% | +11.06% | +10.00% | +69.93% |
JGLO | -3.98% | -1.43% | +6.21% | +4.35% | - | |
| Flows | QEF | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$7 M | -$10 M | -$44 M |
JGLO | +$12 M | +$53 M | +$215 M | +$220 M | - |
QEF vs JGLO exposure
Countries
QEF
USA
60.11%
Other
39.89%
JGLO
USA
71.43%
Other
28.57%
Sectors
QEF
Technology
38.85%
Finance
21.39%
Industrials
8.02%
Healthcare
7.90%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.25%
Other
16.58%
JGLO
Technology
42.23%
Finance
18.09%
Healthcare
8.07%
Other
31.62%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QEF
NVIDIA Corp.
6.19%
Apple, Inc.
5.01%
Microsoft Corp.
4.11%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.49%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.37%
Broadcom Inc.
2.00%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.57%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.37%
JGLO
NVIDIA Corp.
8.10%
Microsoft Corp.
6.48%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.92%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.29%
Apple, Inc.
3.89%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.25%
ASML Holding NV
2.86%
Johnson & Johnson
2.60%
Safran SA
2.60%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.38%
Diversification
QEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 132 total
29.20%
JGLO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 80 total
41.37%
Characteristics
Compare
QEF
JGLO
| Provider | AGF | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.16% | 0.20% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | February 12, 2018 | July 23, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about QEF and JGLO
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QEF or JGLO?
As of October 29, 2026, QEF has returned 11.06% year to date, while JGLO has returned 6.21%. QEF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QEF or JGLO?
As of October 29, 2026, QEF manages $112.58 M in assets, while JGLO manages $258.04 M. JGLO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QEF and JGLO managed?
QEF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. JGLO is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do QEF and JGLO emphasize?
QEF is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. JGLO is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QEF or JGLO?
Year to date, QEF has seen -$7.14 M in net flows, compared with +$215.44 M for JGLO. JGLO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QEF and JGLO compare?
QEF has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while JGLO has an expense ratio of 0.47%.
What are the top holdings of QEF and JGLO?
QEF's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. JGLO's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QEF or JGLO?
QEF holds 130 securities, while JGLO holds 79. On holdings count, QEF is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.