QIF
AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF

Full QIF fund page
VS
ZGIF
BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series

Full ZGIF fund page

Compare AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF) vs BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series (ZGIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. QIF and ZGIF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, QIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 1.19% for ZGIF. Performance-wise, QIF has returned 9.68% year-to-date with -$7 M in net flows, whereas ZGIF is at 8.75% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15Oct 22Oct 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 29, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
QIF
+4.21%-1.77%+9.68%+6.78%+62.90%
ZGIF
+4.20%-1.84%+8.75%+7.96%+66.88%
Flows
QIF
+$1 M+$3 M-$7 M-$3 M-$130 M
ZGIF
+$0 M+$1 M+$2 M+$2 M-$47 M

QIF vs ZGIF exposure

Countries

QIF
USA
51.67%
Spain
12.04%
Canada
8.77%
Other
27.52%
ZGIF
USA
49.60%
Canada
11.66%
Spain
9.52%
Other
29.21%

Sectors

QIF
Utilities
44.22%
Industrials
20.59%
Energy
19.39%
Other
15.81%
ZGIF
Utilities
55.88%
Industrials
26.58%
Energy
13.33%
As of October 29, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

QIF
Iberdrola SA
5.45%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.83%
Aena S.M.E. SA
4.55%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
3.19%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.50%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
2.44%
TC Energy Corp.
2.41%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.36%
Entergy Corp.
2.21%
Microsoft Corp.
2.17%
ZGIF
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.31%
Aena S.M.E. SA
5.00%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.80%
Iberdrola SA
4.53%
Transurban Group Ltd.
4.32%
The Southern Co.
3.83%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.56%
RWE AG
3.40%
Evergy, Inc.
3.33%
Constellation Energy Corp.
3.22%

Diversification

QIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
32.10%
ZGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
41.31%

Characteristics

Compare
QIF
ZGIF
ProviderAGFBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.82%2.81%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 12, 2018June 26, 2023

Frequently asked questions about QIF and ZGIF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: QIF or ZGIF?
As of October 29, 2026, QIF has returned 9.68% year to date, while ZGIF has returned 8.75%. QIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QIF or ZGIF?
As of October 29, 2026, QIF manages $144.05 M in assets, while ZGIF manages $3.20 M. QIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QIF and ZGIF managed?
QIF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. ZGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do QIF and ZGIF emphasize?
QIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. ZGIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QIF or ZGIF?
Year to date, QIF has seen -$6.82 M in net flows, compared with +$2.14 M for ZGIF. ZGIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QIF and ZGIF compare?
QIF has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while ZGIF has an expense ratio of 1.16%.
What are the top holdings of QIF and ZGIF?
QIF's largest holdings include Iberdrola SA, Enbridge, Inc., and Aena S.M.E. SA. ZGIF's top holdings include NextEra Energy, Inc., Aena S.M.E. SA, and Duke Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QIF or ZGIF?
QIF holds 87 securities, while ZGIF holds 39. On holdings count, QIF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about QIF and ZGIF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds