VS
When evaluating costs, QQCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.84%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, QQCC has returned 14.94% year-to-date with +$93 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 31.66% with +$29 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQCC
HEWB
| AuM | $708.65 M | $348.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.84% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.78% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.74% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQCC | -1.21% | -1.24% | +14.94% | +22.20% | +63.62% |
HEWB | -0.79% | +8.73% | +31.66% | +53.47% | +159.60% | |
| Flows | QQCC | +$8 M | +$25 M | +$93 M | +$133 M | +$477 M |
HEWB | +$2 M | +$17 M | +$29 M | +$28 M | +$35 M |
QQCC vs HEWB exposure
Countries
QQCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
QQCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
QQCC
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
QQCC
HEWB
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 11.15% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 14, 2011 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about QQCC and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQCC or HEWB?
As of September 4, 2026, QQCC has returned 14.94% year to date, while HEWB has returned 31.66%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQCC or HEWB?
As of September 4, 2026, QQCC manages $708.65 M in assets, while HEWB manages $348.98 M. QQCC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQCC and HEWB managed?
QQCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQCC or HEWB?
Year to date, QQCC has seen +$92.97 M in net flows, compared with +$28.82 M for HEWB. QQCC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQCC and HEWB compare?
QQCC has an expense ratio of 0.78%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about QQCC and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.