VS
When evaluating costs, QQQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, QQQT has returned 23.07% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 12.5% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQT
XIC
| AuM | $146.79 M | $31,310.89 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.46% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQT | -2.40% | +16.52% | +23.07% | +43.10% | +137.03% |
XIC | +0.59% | +3.22% | +12.50% | +31.70% | +89.28% | |
| Flows | QQQT | +$4 M | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$40 M | +$93 M |
XIC | +$820 M | +$1,912 M | +$6,530 M | +$7,821 M | +$12,618 M |
QQQT vs XIC exposure
Countries
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.41%
Sectors
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
39.60%
Non-Energy Materials
18.18%
Energy
16.99%
Industrials
8.23%
Other
16.99%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.42%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.32%
Shopify, Inc.
4.05%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.32%
Bank of Montreal
3.18%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.81%
Brookfield Corp.
2.78%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.74%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.62%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.55%
Diversification
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 220 total
36.78%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQT
XIC
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.24% | 2.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 11, 2023 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQT and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQT or XIC?
As of July 16, 2026, QQQT has returned 23.07% year to date, while XIC has returned 12.50%. QQQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQT or XIC?
As of July 16, 2026, QQQT manages $146.79 M in assets, while XIC manages $31.31 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQT and XIC managed?
QQQT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQT or XIC?
Year to date, QQQT has seen +$17.56 M in net flows, compared with +$6,530.40 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQT and XIC compare?
QQQT has an expense ratio of 0.46%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about QQQT and XIC
How to Invest in Palantir Through Thematic and Momentum ETFs
Palantir leads U.S. equities in H1 2025 as AI ETFs surge.
Posted on 7/8/2025 by Kyle Anthony inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.