VS
When evaluating costs, QQQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, QQQT has returned 23.07% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 35.79% with +$267 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQT
ZEB
| AuM | $146.79 M | $7,493.90 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.46% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.65% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQT | -2.40% | +16.52% | +23.07% | +43.10% | +137.03% |
ZEB | +6.04% | +19.90% | +35.79% | +71.33% | +157.89% | |
| Flows | QQQT | +$4 M | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$40 M | +$93 M |
ZEB | +$1,233 M | +$1,278 M | +$267 M | +$768 M | -$484 M |
QQQT vs ZEB exposure
Countries
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%
Diversification
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQT
ZEB
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.24% | 2.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 11, 2023 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQT and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQT or ZEB?
As of July 16, 2026, QQQT has returned 23.07% year to date, while ZEB has returned 35.79%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQT or ZEB?
As of July 16, 2026, QQQT manages $146.79 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.49 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQT and ZEB managed?
QQQT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQT or ZEB?
Year to date, QQQT has seen +$17.56 M in net flows, compared with +$266.52 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQT and ZEB compare?
QQQT has an expense ratio of 0.46%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about QQQT and ZEB
How to Invest in Palantir Through Thematic and Momentum ETFs
Palantir leads U.S. equities in H1 2025 as AI ETFs surge.
Posted on 7/8/2025 by Kyle Anthony inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.