VS
When evaluating costs, QQQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, QQQT has returned 23.07% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 11.75% with +$285 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQT
ZSP
| AuM | $146.79 M | $23,773.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.46% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQT | -2.40% | +16.52% | +23.07% | +43.10% | +137.03% |
ZSP | -0.20% | +7.33% | +11.75% | +21.86% | +80.75% | |
| Flows | QQQT | +$4 M | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$40 M | +$93 M |
ZSP | -$338 M | +$44 M | +$285 M | +$842 M | +$4,796 M |
QQQT vs ZSP exposure
Countries
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.86%
Sectors
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
46.52%
Finance
12.65%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.38%
Healthcare
8.23%
Industrials
7.68%
Other
15.54%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
8.04%
Apple, Inc.
7.08%
Microsoft Corp.
4.89%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.51%
Broadcom Inc.
3.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.15%
Tesla, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.61%
Diversification
QQQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
39.24%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQT
ZSP
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.24% | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 11, 2023 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQT and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQT or ZSP?
As of July 16, 2026, QQQT has returned 23.07% year to date, while ZSP has returned 11.75%. QQQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQT or ZSP?
As of July 16, 2026, QQQT manages $146.79 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.77 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQT and ZSP managed?
QQQT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQT or ZSP?
Year to date, QQQT has seen +$17.56 M in net flows, compared with +$284.95 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQT and ZSP compare?
QQQT has an expense ratio of 0.46%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about QQQT and ZSP
How to Invest in Palantir Through Thematic and Momentum ETFs
Palantir leads U.S. equities in H1 2025 as AI ETFs surge.
Posted on 7/8/2025 by Kyle Anthony inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.