VS
When evaluating costs, QQQU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, QQQU has returned 20.75% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.78% with -$518 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQU
HBNK
| AuM | $12.36 M | $732.39 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.44% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQU | -23.05% | +2.34% | +20.75% | +39.54% | - |
HBNK | +0.44% | +16.12% | +32.78% | +67.61% | +147.76% | |
| Flows | QQQU | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$0 M | -$2 M | - |
HBNK | -$70 M | -$73 M | -$518 M | -$839 M | -$65 M |
QQQU vs HBNK exposure
Countries
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.94%
Sectors
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.94%
As of July 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.34%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.85%
National Bank of Canada
15.79%
Diversification
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQU
HBNK
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.54% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 22, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQU and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQU or HBNK?
As of July 30, 2026, QQQU has returned 20.75% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.78%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQU or HBNK?
As of July 30, 2026, QQQU manages $12.36 M in assets, while HBNK manages $732.39 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQU and HBNK managed?
QQQU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index - USD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQU or HBNK?
Year to date, QQQU has seen -$0.39 M in net flows, compared with -$518.10 M for HBNK. QQQU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQU and HBNK compare?
QQQU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about QQQU and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.